Home U.S. Coin Forum

Two Kennedy's - Struck thru and die gouge

WindycityWindycity Posts: 3,548 ✭✭✭✭✭
Two interesting Kennedy halves... a 1964 struck thru grease (also a minor DDO) and a 1972 D with a fairly dramatic die gouge through the lips and additional gouges through the O of GOD.

image
image

image
image
image
<a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.mullencoins.com">Mullen Coins Website - Windycity Coin website

Comments

  • coinkid855coinkid855 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭
    I think the thing through Kennedy's lips on the 1972 is a small die break. I'm thinking that might be what's going on with the O in God too.




    -Paul
  • gonzergonzer Posts: 3,052 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice but I'd say those are die cracks and not gouges. Can't say's that I've seen a Kennedy with so many.
  • OuthaulOuthaul Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cool, but the second one looks like a lamination error.

    Cheers,

    Bob
  • WindycityWindycity Posts: 3,548 ✭✭✭✭✭
    When I first looked at the coin I thought lamination error but under the microscope, not a lamination error. Then I thought die crack/break. Then die gouge with die break. Very odd looking. I wouldn't argue the die break theory but here are a couple other closeups. Welcome opinions.

    image
    image
    <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.mullencoins.com">Mullen Coins Website - Windycity Coin website
  • Interesting looking '72-D Kennedy. You don't often see them THAT abraded!

    Jon
    www.sullivannumismatics.com Dealer in Mint Error Coins.
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    that 72 has all kinds of shizzle going on, fingerprints, die scrubbing. gouge
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • Aegis3Aegis3 Posts: 2,912 ✭✭✭
    Anyone else thinking that '64 may be struck through something other than grease?
    --

    Ed. S.

    (EJS)
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>that 72 has all kinds of shizzle going on, fingerprints, die scrubbing. gouge >>

    Flip that 72-D over and see if the Initials are missing!
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • ConstantineConstantine Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭
    That 72-D looks like a die break and then worn or fatigued dies could explain some of the surface pattern? Regardless of cause image
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭
    1972's from Denver were usually nice strikes, the one you show is about the worst coin I've ever seen for that year. I still think you have a planchet problem along with die issues, but to me the area that stands out is Kennedy's sideburn. There is an issue here that dictates a lamination problem, possibly a peel before striking. The other areas were just raised in the voids because there was not enough metal to completely fill the device cavities.

    The abraded and worn dies in conjunction with a deformed planchet created all of the above. I'd be willing to bet the coin before this one and after this one were within Mint limits to release into circulation.
    You happen to come across this dog, it's so ugly it's a fun coin.
    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file