Home World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

Friday Fidgets-South Africa Proof sets, whatever to doo??:+)

Over the last several weeks I've been working on some new PCGS Registry sets and working on the theme of Elizabeth 11 and George VI coins
(because they're more available and less expensive) in the various countries that are, or were at one time, part of the British Empire.

Our friend Dimitri has helped on some and I've bought some singles and proof sets on Ebay and elsewhere.

I'm showing here some examples from some of the proof sets; some because I think they're terrific and just wanted to share them
and some because I'd appreciate any comments or suggestions on submission-basically whether or not to try and remove some negative
environmental alterations that would affect the grade.

For example:

Here's a 1956 2 1/2 Shillings. The reverse is gorgeous in my opinion but the obverse toning is less than desirable.

I'm not asking on this one since it would be dumb, even for me, to mess with it. BUT-how do you think the graders
would treat the coin?

image

image

Obverse and reverse of a 1952 5 shillings. Note the gray streak in the reverse field....

image

image

Reverse of a 1956 shilling. Note the toning. A positive or a negative?

image

No questions on the next few; just wanted to share them...

image

image

image

image

image

No,no- the kids and the cat are all right honey.
It's just that I got my PCGS grades.

Comments

  • Really hoping some of you fellows that have been down this road many times can offer some suggestions.

    Regards and thanks
    No,no- the kids and the cat are all right honey.
    It's just that I got my PCGS grades.
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    Those are lovely pieces that should easily grade above 67. I see no problems that may have occurred with your toning to get them BB , but learned a long time ago that My opinion on what the Grading services BB is oft in error. I have a 55 set that I sent some pieces in and one came back damaged, ended up 66 instead of higher. Looked like someone mashed the coin in sand and pitted the cheek, I swear it was not there when I sent it in. Same thing Happened to a 1982 panda, fresh out of the wrapper, sent it in got a 66 for a staple scratch on the rev. I'm not sending in more to them.image
  • Well I got the grades on this series of proofs this morning and they were really very good.

    I had one PR 65-the lowest grade any of them got-2 PR 67s with the rest at PR66 and PR 66 RD.

    I will say though, toning does seem to bring a coin down a point or so, no matter how colorful or attractive.

    Frankly I'll still take it--a beautifully colored PR 66 as compared with a non cameo brilliant proof-every time......
    No,no- the kids and the cat are all right honey.
    It's just that I got my PCGS grades.
  • WWWWWW Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭
    They all look very nice. Good lick on your future conquests.
Sign In or Register to comment.