No PD qualifier??
bbuckner22
Posts: 1,028 ✭
71 Clark PSA 9 I know this card is razor sharp with great centering, but what is the first thing you notice about it? I've gotten several PD qualifiers where you need a microscope to see a dot, I'm thinking the PSA standards are becoming way too lapse.
From what I can tell, 707 is the DOLLAR STORE compared to deans_cards. For what that guy charges, if I ever bought anything from him I would expect it to be delivered to me in a frickin' limo.
~WalterSobchak
~WalterSobchak
0
Comments
<< <i>71 Clark PSA 9 I know this card is razor sharp with great centering, but what is the first thing you notice about it? I've gotten several PD qualifiers where you need a microscope to see a dot, I'm thinking the PSA standards are becoming way too lapse. >>
Wow! I know they tend to be more lax on PDs not on the image itself, but for a 9 I expect not to have one the size of a pin hole.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
Rodney
<< <i>Seems like PSA would have caught that huge yellow dot between the player's name and the word pitcher....
Rodney >>