Definitely an overdate. Not damaged unless you consider delamination damage. Although lamination is common of Buffalo nickels, I must admit I've never seen one on an overdate before.
"government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
<< <i>Looks like the overdate due to the top hole of the 8 being offset to the left of the bottom hole.
And a planchet lamination error also. If so, congrats on both. >>
A planchet lamination is a defect, not an error. >>
Actually, it's both.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Lamination for sure as this did plague these Buffs, many Buffs from around 1918 through the twenties have this problem with lamination as the mint would receive the material for the planchets from outside vendors which did not mix well at all. As far as the over date, looks to be the over date from what I can see....You did REAL good if so....Congratulations is in order!!
The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
The problem is that the coins like this cant be used in registry sets-sure you can get a numerical grade on them by forking out 100.00 or so for error service, but errors are not allowed in the registry. might as well look at it and grade it yourself or keep it as a gennie-----------BigE
Comments
I knew it would happen.
Looks like the overdate due to the top hole of the 8 being offset to the left of the bottom hole.
And a planchet lamination error also. If so, congrats on both.
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
<< <i>Looks like the overdate due to the top hole of the 8 being offset to the left of the bottom hole.
And a planchet lamination error also. If so, congrats on both. >>
A planchet lamination is a defect, not an error.
I knew it would happen.
BigE, happy to hear you have one like it as I wasn't sure. I have never seen another overdate with a planchet flaw.
Joe.
Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
<< <i>1918/17? >>
sure looks like it.
<< <i>Looks like the overdate due to the top hole of the 8 being offset to the left of the bottom hole.
And a planchet lamination error also. If so, congrats on both. >>
What Guitarwes said, on both counts. Congratulations!
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
...appears to be over/date.
<< <i>
<< <i>Looks like the overdate due to the top hole of the 8 being offset to the left of the bottom hole.
And a planchet lamination error also. If so, congrats on both. >>
A planchet lamination is a defect, not an error. >>
Actually, it's both.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire