Nicest '52 Mantle PSA 1.5 Ever?

Just doing my nightly perusing of '52s on Ebay and this Mantle caught my eye. Looking at the card (of course in hand would be better) I think the seller has a point. Many people advertise that their
card was undergraded and I think this Mantle is. The corners and centering are pretty darn good here and I think a ST qualifier should have been given with a higher grade. That being said, it's one of
the best 1.5s I've ever seen. What do you guys think? Have a good weekend. Doug
'52 Mantle 1.5
card was undergraded and I think this Mantle is. The corners and centering are pretty darn good here and I think a ST qualifier should have been given with a higher grade. That being said, it's one of
the best 1.5s I've ever seen. What do you guys think? Have a good weekend. Doug
'52 Mantle 1.5
0
Comments
eyebone
<< <i>What does the FR mean? Does that mean the grade only applies to the front? As nice as the back is, it's badly off-center and doesn't meet the 90/10 standard. >>
FR= Fair Condition, and I think card backs have different standards for a card being called OC.
Other stains the card usually gets net graded.
Steve
<< <i>ST qualifier is generally given only for wax stains.
Other stains the card usually gets net graded.
Steve >>
Wax, gum, caramel, or something else originally packaged with the card; otherwise correct.
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
working on 1956 Topps in PSA 6-7
CU Ancient Members badge member.
Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums
Prewarcardcollector does this all the time, just like he's doing with his current auction (Rose RC SGC 98) or his 54 Topps Kaline RC PSA 7
"This card is closer to a PSA 9 than a PSA 7. Almost dead centered with four NM-MT corners and FLAWLESS print and focus. The color is exceptional for the issue and the borders are white. This card is an outright steal at anything below the PSA 8 price tag."
working on 1956 Topps in PSA 6-7