Proof bust halves...pics added
jdillane
Posts: 2,365 ✭✭✭
Anyone know the best reference? Am particularly curious about which overton varieties...
Joe's 1836 appears above reproach as a proof. Heck she seems to lay claim to cam.
Here are cell phone images that I just took that leave much to be desired:
Joe's 1836 appears above reproach as a proof. Heck she seems to lay claim to cam.
Here are cell phone images that I just took that leave much to be desired:
0
Comments
Anyone know ?
Ed. S.
(EJS)
Oh and no pics yet - sorry.
really need to snag a cam and post some pics. Have a very low grade 1795 FH half that I wanna share too. If the coin is legit, methinks she's gonna need her own overton #.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>
>>
That's not the Byers coin (bought in and sold by Stacks subsequently for much less) (much darker, long scratch obv, N64 and I'm gagging) or the NY Connoisseur coin (much nicer) which I split with the The Genius Trapped Inside an Idiot and that TGTIAT said he sold to Dino. This one looks better than either from the image. Joe's no slouch in this department either.
CJ
Gotta love that 1836. Simply stunning!!
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i> >>
Also, quite a few die marriages are known in prooflike condition and are often and incorrectly referred to as proofs. I have owed prooflike 1821 O102 and 1829 O112, and have early strikes of 1805 O107 and 1806 O104 that are semi-prooflike. Whether a coin is prooflike or a proof is difficult to confirm.
<< <i>Selling that 1836 proof lettered edge half (ex. Garrett) was easily one of the 5 dumbest coin decisions I ever made!! Boy do I miss her! >>
boiler78, What are the other 4
Let's just say when you combine ADD and OCD with 30+ years of serious coin addiction ...... you start to accumulate regrets.