in the mid 1940's Fred Boyd had a Paquet reverse gold double eagle in a 2x2 marked "Double Eagle, counterfeit?"
of course it was far from being a counterfeit; Boyd thought the 'odd reverse' meant that it was not a genuine coin.......little did he know what he was sitting on! i think Kosoff was the dealer who finally attributed it as a genuine coin and a Paquet reverse no less
I had a man come into my store with a coin that his grandmother left him. It was in one of the gift boxes from the early 20th century for gold coins. He just wanted to know the value.
It was an S mint Paquet.
Hopefully, I will get to handle it some day.
PNG member, numismatic dealer since 1965. Operates a retail store, also has exhibited at over 1000 shows. I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
With almost 140 certified between the two services, accounting for resubmissions, there's probably 75+ that are known. With a number like that, it seems entirely plausible that there are some scudzy examples sitting in a 2x2 in some uninformed dealer's case.
<< <i>And here's the gilt copper 1859, which some attribute to Paquet, but it is more likely a privately struck concoction of some sort.
>>
I agree that doesn't look like Paquet's work. I've noticed that different die sinkers of that time often used different denticulation from each other. Can anyone recognize any similarities to any tokens or medals?
Comments
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Does cherrypicking a Philly Paquet count? >>
Absolutely. Tell us about it, Andy!
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
Those are patterns.
Here's the gold piece, which is unique, unquestionably real, and in the ANS collection. (It also exists in copper, and gilt copper.)
And there also exist uniface splashers from unfinished dies:
And here's the gilt copper 1859, which some attribute to Paquet, but it is more likely a privately struck concoction of some sort.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
of course it was far from being a counterfeit; Boyd thought the 'odd reverse' meant that it was not a genuine coin.......little did he know what he was sitting on! i think Kosoff was the dealer who finally attributed it as a genuine coin and a Paquet reverse no less
also, he paid $50 for it at the time
www.brunkauctions.com
It was an S mint Paquet.
Hopefully, I will get to handle it some day.
I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
eBaystore
<< <i>I guess anything is possible. >>
With almost 140 certified between the two services, accounting for resubmissions, there's probably 75+ that are known. With a number like that, it seems entirely plausible that there are some scudzy examples sitting in a 2x2 in some uninformed dealer's case.
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
<< <i>Paquet $20 >>
Please explain.
CoinFacts Link showing the different style of lettering (reverse)
it is rare as a San Fran release in 1861 and exceedingly rare as a Philadelphia of the same year (only 2 Phillys known last i was aware)
www.brunkauctions.com
<< <i>And here's the gilt copper 1859, which some attribute to Paquet, but it is more likely a privately struck concoction of some sort.
>>
I agree that doesn't look like Paquet's work. I've noticed that different die sinkers of that time often used different denticulation from each other. Can anyone recognize any similarities to any tokens or medals?
Ed. S.
(EJS)