Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Parallel versions of cards (refractors for instance)

Quick question...
Do the parallel versions of cards count toward registry sets.

For instance, if I collect a set that has a 2010 bowman chrome card, can I instead use the 2010 bowman chrome gold /50 version to meet the set requirement.

Likewise for other modern sets, if a registry set requires a 1993 topps card, would a 1993 topps gold card also work for that slot in the registry.

Comments

  • No. Those would be regarded as separate sets in the registry.

    Kevin
    I collect PSA cards of the following:
    Billy Ripken
    Cal Ripken, Jr. 1980-2002
    Cal Ripken, Sr.
    Hall of Fame Rookies
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    PSA says no.

    One of the many reasons why I'm not into the registry like I used to be.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25


  • << <i>PSA says no.

    One of the many reasons why I'm not into the registry like I used to be. >>



    I'm suprised they don't allow better / rarer versions of cards... at least in sets that don't include the parallel
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭


    << <i>I'm suprised they don't allow better / rarer versions of cards... at least in sets that don't include the parallel >>



    For rookie cards, if Beckett doesn't put "RC" next to it and put it in their "Rookie Card Encyclopedia", then it won't be recognized by PSA as being a "rookie card." On top of that, Beckett bows to MLB's forced definition of "rookie card."

    So, a 2008 Bowman Chrome Evan Longoria IS a rookie card.
    A 2008 Bowman Chrome Evan Longoria Superfractor is NOT a rookie card.
    A 2006 Bowman Chrome Evan Longoria AU is NOT a rookie card.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Sign In or Register to comment.