Parallel versions of cards (refractors for instance)
Reljac
Posts: 758
Quick question...
Do the parallel versions of cards count toward registry sets.
For instance, if I collect a set that has a 2010 bowman chrome card, can I instead use the 2010 bowman chrome gold /50 version to meet the set requirement.
Likewise for other modern sets, if a registry set requires a 1993 topps card, would a 1993 topps gold card also work for that slot in the registry.
Do the parallel versions of cards count toward registry sets.
For instance, if I collect a set that has a 2010 bowman chrome card, can I instead use the 2010 bowman chrome gold /50 version to meet the set requirement.
Likewise for other modern sets, if a registry set requires a 1993 topps card, would a 1993 topps gold card also work for that slot in the registry.
0
Comments
Kevin
Billy Ripken
Cal Ripken, Jr. 1980-2002
Cal Ripken, Sr.
Hall of Fame Rookies
One of the many reasons why I'm not into the registry like I used to be.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>PSA says no.
One of the many reasons why I'm not into the registry like I used to be. >>
I'm suprised they don't allow better / rarer versions of cards... at least in sets that don't include the parallel
<< <i>I'm suprised they don't allow better / rarer versions of cards... at least in sets that don't include the parallel >>
For rookie cards, if Beckett doesn't put "RC" next to it and put it in their "Rookie Card Encyclopedia", then it won't be recognized by PSA as being a "rookie card." On top of that, Beckett bows to MLB's forced definition of "rookie card."
So, a 2008 Bowman Chrome Evan Longoria IS a rookie card.
A 2008 Bowman Chrome Evan Longoria Superfractor is NOT a rookie card.
A 2006 Bowman Chrome Evan Longoria AU is NOT a rookie card.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25