multiholder and uniholder question
botanist
Posts: 524 ✭✭✭
Is it preferable to slab sets of coins as singles, or to combine a set in a multiholder/uniholder slab? Those two terms, multiholders and uniholders are often treated as synonyms. I'm thinking of such types of sets as the four denominations for a year of gold eagles, platinum eagles, or 2008 gold buffalos. Do sets as singles usually sell for more than combined sets? Any other considerations?
0
Comments
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
I have other sets, mostly world coin sets, in NGC multiholders, where it makes sense.
I do wish PCGS made better boxes for the uniholder. I like the PCGS holder better than the NGC multiholder, but the PCGS boxes are kind of lousy.
For your bullion coin sets, I would definitely go the multiholder or uniholder route. Much more impressive visually.
<< <i>Ngc will only do these for bulk orders now unfortunately. >>
Yeah and thats just dumb! I was hoping to someday maybe have a set of War Nickles put in a multholder. That would look cool!
<< <i>Ngc will only do these for bulk orders now unfortunately. >>
I didn't know that - thanks for the heads up.
<< <i>Ngc will only do these for bulk orders now unfortunately. >>
Is that a very recent policy change?
<< <i>
<< <i>Ngc will only do these for bulk orders now unfortunately. >>
Is that a very recent policy change? >>
Yes, starting this year. Its idiotic, and they will lose business by doing so.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
<< <i>what does NGC consider a "bulk" order to be?? >>
By the way Keets, your NGC multiholder of American Revolution Bicentennial medals is a magnificent item, with a tremendous visual impact. Putting the individual separate coins side-by-side, raw or slabbed singly, would in my opinion be much less powerful. Congratulations and thanks for showing it.