Is this a 1916 or 1917 SLQ?

pcgs69 · January 13, 2011 10:08AM

Still working on the attributes of the '16 versus '17. Thanks for your help!

Rampage · January 13, 2011 10:28AM

That is 1917.

Moldnut · January 13, 2011 10:29AM

Agreed 100% 1917

USMoneylover · January 13, 2011 10:32AM

My vote is 1917 also

QuarterCollector · January 13, 2011 10:41AM

1917, sorry

ebaybuyer · January 13, 2011 12:08PM

1917 the rivets on the shield are WAYYYYY to well defined to be a 1916

mattniss · January 13, 2011 12:11PM

The rivets on the shield are the giveaway. It's a 1917.

seanq · January 13, 2011 12:44PM

If you search the forum, there were a couple of excellent threads recently showing some diagnostics for ID'ing a dateless 1916 SLQ. The one I remember most is the fold on the drapery across the extended arm, it should extend further out and below the top of the wall on a 1916.

Sean Reynolds

stealer · January 13, 2011 12:47PM

1917, I find the easiest way to tell is the drapery by the ankle.

crypto79 · January 13, 2011 1:02PM

<< <i>1917, I find the easiest way to tell is the drapery by the ankle. >>

or the rivets on the shield

fcloud · January 13, 2011 1:08PM

rivets too large and detailed 1917

kevinstang · January 13, 2011 1:11PM

<< <i>

<< <i>1917, I find the easiest way to tell is the drapery by the ankle. >>

or the rivets on the shield >>

Or the line in the drapery below libery's outreached arm, on the 1917's it doesn't extend past the stars on wall, on the 1916 it does- learned that one from this site as well! Stars on wall are also alot weaker on a 1916,if present at all on a coin like this one with this amount of wear.

Is this a 1916 or 1917 SLQ?

Comments

Leave a Comment