That is quite interesting. As WS said, makes you wonder how many else are floating around. Thanks for the heads up.
Not to go off topic, but since you linked us to the auction, I was surfing the other Lincolns (pre '33) and was quite alarmed by the poorly struck Lincolns in 64 and 65 PCGS holders. I drink the Koolaid but I am disappointed. How does that 14-D get a plus??? There are a few choice pieces but some real dogs.
I got a raw 1912 MPL off Ebay 5 or so years ago for $50. Sold it to Brian Wagner back when I sold my PCGS MPLs, don't recall what grade it got when he submitted it.
Hi Bob, Glad to see via your profile that you are now settled in California from South Carolina.
As for the 1916 MPL in 58BN, it is the only one less than proof 60 currently in a PCGS, NGC or ANACS holder. As for the 1909VDB MPL there are only 2 listed as less than proof 60 and they are both ANACS 55BN. My guess is that they are no longer in that designated slab. There are probably a few other MPL's out there without certification by PCGS, NGC, or even ANACS. I believe their value is ONLY there IF they get slabbed by PCGS or NGC. Steve
Comments
You know others exist..maybe even a 1909 vdb!
WS
Not to go off topic, but since you linked us to the auction, I was surfing the other Lincolns (pre '33) and was quite alarmed by the poorly struck Lincolns in 64 and 65 PCGS holders. I drink the Koolaid but I am disappointed. How does that 14-D get a plus??? There are a few choice pieces but some real dogs.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/2819
I got a raw 1912 MPL off Ebay 5 or so years ago for $50. Sold it to Brian Wagner back when I sold my PCGS MPLs, don't recall what grade it got when he submitted it.
My Ebay
1934-1958 RB Lincoln Short Set
<< <i>Dang, and a 16 at that...
You know others exist..maybe even a 1909 vdb!
WS >>
Hi Bob,
Glad to see via your profile that you are now settled in California from South Carolina.
As for the 1916 MPL in 58BN, it is the only one less than proof 60 currently in a PCGS, NGC or ANACS holder. As for the 1909VDB MPL there are only 2 listed as less than proof 60 and they are both ANACS 55BN. My guess is that they are no longer in that designated slab. There are probably a few other MPL's out there without certification by PCGS, NGC, or even ANACS. I believe their value is ONLY there IF they get slabbed by PCGS or NGC.
Steve
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
<< <i>from the looks of the out of focus slab scratches on the reverse...Id say this has been holdered for awhile. >>
On November 10, 2008, BWRC wrote:
Lowest grade to date at PCGS, 2 @ PR60
-Paul
Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
-Paul
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
In your scenario, the Genny for sure.
<< <i>So how did this one get left out of the Pop report? >>
It's in the pop under PR58