1857 Large Cent 'small date' question
I purchased this coin this past summer from a Heritage auction:
![image](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4964/anacsau50.jpg)
This coin is an old little white Anacs holder AU-50. Anyways, my question about this coin...could this be a circulated proof? I've owned several 1857 Large and Small date, Large cents over the years...and this one stuck out to me due to the very strong strike on the reverse. All of my previous MS, AU and XF examples had mushy reverses. The obverse leads me to believe it is not since, since 10 of the 13 stars are softly struck...but I'm hoping an expert can chime in. Thanks!
![image](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4964/anacsau50.jpg)
This coin is an old little white Anacs holder AU-50. Anyways, my question about this coin...could this be a circulated proof? I've owned several 1857 Large and Small date, Large cents over the years...and this one stuck out to me due to the very strong strike on the reverse. All of my previous MS, AU and XF examples had mushy reverses. The obverse leads me to believe it is not since, since 10 of the 13 stars are softly struck...but I'm hoping an expert can chime in. Thanks!
0
Comments
Empty Nest Collection
Matt’s Mattes
Is it possible that it was a proof "adjustment" strike or a trial strike, that was just released to circulation?
I am not an expert at anything!
Your coin is not a proof ( IMO ) as the tip of the coronet
has a weak strike and appears to be an N-2. Proof coins
were struck from N-3 & N-5 dies, which have a good strike
at the coronet area.
As was stated, your coin does not have the sharp characteristics
of a proof coin. Reference Matt's N-3 and
this registry N-5 example
R.I.P. Bear
I am, however, looking for a nice example, and hope to have the opportunity to purchase one at a less than outlandish price when it comes available
Empty Nest Collection
Matt’s Mattes
The Penny Lady®
And since we're sharing 1857's, here's a large date with a little red (64 RB):
Have fun...Mike