Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

(Updated) Warmed up new Epson 300 Scanner - 20 years of Topps Packs...

Just got the scanner today and I've begun scanning my collection for both insurance reasons and personal enjoyment!!!

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for sharing. I have never seen some of the packs before my time.

    I just joined the scanner world a few days ago and was thrilled to finally be able to do so.


    Very sweet cards!
  • artistlostartistlost Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭
    Very cool. Nice collection!

    and nice scans!
    baseball & hockey junkie

    drugs of choice
    NHL hall of fame rookies
  • MULLINS5MULLINS5 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭
    Nice scanner!

    Oh and nice packs too image
  • cadets68cadets68 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭
    Very nice.

    Shawn
    After those four National League games, Gorman Thomas was never the same, and neither were the Brewers, and come to think of it neither was I.

    Josh Wilker - Cardboard Gods
  • more packs from other sports...

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • HoofHeartedHoofHearted Posts: 2,537 ✭✭
    WoW! Very impressive collection scanned here! Thanks for taking the time to share your efforts!

    You'd really enjoy seeing bobsbbcards collection, I'm sure!
  • VitoCo1972VitoCo1972 Posts: 6,132 ✭✭✭
    Love the packs! I do stuff like this all the time too, but the total combined value of every card in the 1988 Topps pack couldn't possibly equal 1/4 of the grading fees. But hey, sets must be finished! image


  • << <i>Love the packs! I do stuff like this all the time too, but the total combined value of every card in the 1988 Topps pack couldn't possibly equal 1/4 of the grading fees. But hey, sets must be finished! image >>



    I may be the only person ever to sub 1986,1987,1988,1989 Topps packs... the crappy thing is I may have to sub more if I ever want to pull some 10's!
    image
  • man o man that is an amazing collection!

    i really need to add some of those to my collection.

    No '75 Mini?

    oh, were those all subbed by yourself?

    you should add the '90 and '91 to round off the "wax" era

    edited to add: are you scanning the backs?
    Big Fan of: HOF Post War RC, Graded RCs
    WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
  • GriffinsGriffins Posts: 6,076 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    I may be the only person ever to sub 1986,1987,1988,1989 Topps packs... the crappy thing is I may have to sub more if I ever want to pull some 10's! >>



    Not the only person!

    Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's

  • heritageheritage Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭
    very nice packs.


  • << <i>man o man that is an amazing collection!

    i really need to add some of those to my collection.

    No '75 Mini?

    oh, were those all subbed by yourself?

    you should add the '90 and '91 to round off the "wax" era

    edited to add: are you scanning the backs? >>



    I subbed everything from 77 up in baseball and the "other"packs I subbed all of them... The mini's are my vice I always open them image
    image
  • MorgothMorgoth Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
    Some Observations about how Topps label changed over time.

    1. What they call the product they are selling

    1970-1973- No mention of cards just the words baseball, gum and inserts are somtimes mentioned.
    1974-1976- The cards are refered to as "Trading Cards"
    1977-1987- The cards are refered to as "Picture Cards"
    1988 -????- The cards are refered to as "Bubblegum Cards"

    2. Years with clean labels, ie. no advertisements or blurbs.
    1972-1973, 1975, 1977-1979, 1982
    Total years= 7

    3. The use of the lower right hand corner blurb for promotions or insert information.
    1970-1971, 1980-1981, 1983-1989
    Total years= 11

    4. The start of the use of the term "The Real One" on their label
    1981-???? hmmmmmmmmmm I wonder why?
    Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set


  • << <i>

    << <i>man o man that is an amazing collection!

    i really need to add some of those to my collection.

    No '75 Mini?

    oh, were those all subbed by yourself?

    you should add the '90 and '91 to round off the "wax" era

    edited to add: are you scanning the backs? >>



    I subbed everything from 77 up in baseball and the "other"packs I subbed all of them... The mini's are my vice I always open them image >>



    VERY NICE and well done Sir!

    as for the Minis....once slabbed, then you wouldnt open it, no? lol

    the more i see the PSA Wax Slab, the more i like the way they look. i have a 2005 Jay Bruce Sterling PSA 9 rookie that i got years ago that is
    in one of what is now called the "wax slab". doesnt look good for gu cards though lol
    Big Fan of: HOF Post War RC, Graded RCs
    WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
  • jmoran19jmoran19 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭
    Very nice!! Any idea what series the 1970 and 1971 packs are?

    Current obsession, all things Topps 1969 - 1972

  • GriffinsGriffins Posts: 6,076 ✭✭✭


    << <i>the more i see the PSA Wax Slab, the more i like the way they look. >>



    I'll strongly disagree here. PSA has some great slabs- T3's, coins, salesman samples- but the pack slab doesn't come anywhere close to those. The pack is a small % of the entire display, and as we've seen on these boards does nothing to protect the pack- on the contrary, it may well be damaging them. Both for eye appeal and protection it ranks no better than a very distant #2.

    Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's



  • << <i>

    << <i>the more i see the PSA Wax Slab, the more i like the way they look. >>



    I'll strongly disagree here. PSA has some great slabs- T3's, coins, salesman samples- but the pack slab doesn't come anywhere close to those. The pack is a small % of the entire display, and as we've seen on these boards does nothing to protect the pack- on the contrary, it may well be damaging them. Both for eye appeal and protection it ranks no better than a very distant #2. >>



    interesting take. Hadnt thought about them damaging packs, but if they slide around inside, then i could see that happening.

    who would you say is #1? i wouldnt touch a GAI product.
    Big Fan of: HOF Post War RC, Graded RCs
    WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle


  • << <i>

    << <i>the more i see the PSA Wax Slab, the more i like the way they look. >>



    I'll strongly disagree here. PSA has some great slabs- T3's, coins, salesman samples- but the pack slab doesn't come anywhere close to those. The pack is a small % of the entire display, and as we've seen on these boards does nothing to protect the pack- on the contrary, it may well be damaging them. Both for eye appeal and protection it ranks no better than a very distant #2. >>



    They are big and bulky but I don't mind since I display them out around my man cave... But Giff is right they do damage packages - the gum can slide around very easy in PSA holders and tear through the sides of packs.
    image


  • << <i>Very nice!! Any idea what series the 1970 and 1971 packs are? >>



    Not sure - I asked Steve over at the BBCE if he could tell and he said no - only sure way would be to bust open the pack.
    image
  • jmoran19jmoran19 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Very nice!! Any idea what series the 1970 and 1971 packs are? >>



    Not sure - I asked Steve over at the BBCE if he could tell and he said no - only sure way would be to bust open the pack. >>



    for the 71 packs I'm pretty sure coins only came in 2nd, 3rd and 4th series packs, never seen a 5th series pack but the 5th series didnot include the coin checklist where the 2nd, 3rd and 4th did.

    Current obsession, all things Topps 1969 - 1972

  • bkingbking Posts: 3,095 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Very nice!! Any idea what series the 1970 and 1971 packs are? >>



    Not sure - I asked Steve over at the BBCE if he could tell and he said no - only sure way would be to bust open the pack. >>



    for the 71 packs I'm pretty sure coins only came in 2nd, 3rd and 4th series packs, never seen a 5th series pack but the 5th series didnot include the coin checklist where the 2nd, 3rd and 4th did. >>



    I don't recall any of the details. but I think in 1970 you can identify at least a couple of the series based on the back ad.
    ----------------------
    Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
    ----------------------

    Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
  • GriffinsGriffins Posts: 6,076 ✭✭✭
    '71 packs didn't have coins until the 3rd series.

    Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's

Sign In or Register to comment.