PSA Free Sub results question

Just had my grades for last year's CC membership pop (yeah, a bit slow to use that voucher) and it leaves me wondering....
I know it's probably been asked to death, but it sure seems to me like the grades on my free sub always are worse than my paid subs. Out of 15 subs, 5 are a grade lower than expected and only 1 pleasant surprise. My last two 50 card subs - I batted at least 80%.
Not suggesting any shenanigans, but any chance these go to the "train the grader" class or something??
I know it's probably been asked to death, but it sure seems to me like the grades on my free sub always are worse than my paid subs. Out of 15 subs, 5 are a grade lower than expected and only 1 pleasant surprise. My last two 50 card subs - I batted at least 80%.
Not suggesting any shenanigans, but any chance these go to the "train the grader" class or something??

----------------------
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
0
Comments
If it's true that the free-sub results are generally worse than the others, it could be because we--as submitters--pay less attention to details when preparing such a sub. We generally appreciate more those things which we must work hard for or pay for. The psychology of the "freebie" may cause us to subconsciously overlook that which we would otherwise consider when we are fully aware that we are paying for the sub.
<< <i>It's very unlikely that the freebies are treated any differently than other cards. Keep in mind that those "freebies" actually cost you a pretty penny in membership fees.
If it's true that the free-sub results are generally worse than the others, it could be because we--as submitters--pay less attention to details when preparing such a sub. We generally appreciate more those things which we must work hard for or pay for. The psychology of the "freebie" may cause us to subconsciously overlook that we which we would otherwise consider when we are fully aware that we are paying for the sub. >>
I actually took items from the stack that was set aside for my Nov CC Special, so I hope that wasn't the case. However, I did lean toward low pop items, so maybe that's all that is at play here.
Just grousing mostly.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<< <i>I have found the exact opposite is true >>
+1
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)