The 4.5 looks to be much nicer than that. Probably a technical aspect that is not easily seen with the scan that precludes it from being an excellent 5 or higher.
Just havin' a little fun with PSA here. I think they're the best TPG overall. Just kills me sometimes, though, that a barely discernible wrinkle makes a great looking card only the slightest bit better than one that's morbidly off center and has severely rounded corners. That's the game though... and I do enjoy playing.
I have no idea how this issue is graded. The back is clean. I graded 1 card and that was it. This has got to be the nicest 2 on the planet. No wrinkle on this one. I was not very happy. I actually thought it was a solid 7.
Elemenopeo
Posts: 2,577 ✭✭
Comments
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
2004 spx
1989 topps psa 10
1959 phillies
Phillies of the 70's
The 4.5 appears to be undergraded.
Of course I don't have them in hand and have no idea what the backs look like.
Bryon do you have these in hand?
Steve
edited to fix your name and mine.
Bad night.
<< <i>The 4 looks like it could be a 2 or a 3.
The 4.5 appears to be undergraded. >>
I agree, and the 4.5 looks like an 8.
Mine is the 4.5. Surprise, surprise.
Just havin' a little fun with PSA here. I think they're the best TPG overall. Just kills me sometimes, though, that a barely discernible wrinkle makes a great looking card only the slightest bit better than one that's morbidly off center and has severely rounded corners. That's the game though... and I do enjoy playing.
Currently collecting 1934 Butterfinger, 1969 Nabisco, 1991 Topps Desert Shield (in PSA 9 or 10), and 1990 Donruss Learning Series (in PSA 10).