<< <i>Not that it really maters, Frnklnlvr, but the NGC Registry only shows ONE 1949 S MS66 Star FBL and here's a full picture of the holder below. I am disappointed that NGC made an error on the pop. report by missing one. Not like them to err on the report. Thanks though, this information drove me re-image the coin and I will replace the registry pictures with some that better showcase this coins incredible colors when held in hand.
>>
Your '49-S is amazing! Yes, the pop report has never showed the PL 66FBL* for whatever reason. IMO it's kind of redundant to have the PL(proof-like) designation and a star but I've never seen the coin in hand so it very well may be worthy of both.
Comments
<< <i>This used to be tied for top pop until that pesky little 68 showed up recenty and brought 100k. MJ
That is one heck of a Walker you have MJ...That pesky 68 has a lot of shoe to fill...
AB
<< <i>Not that it really maters, Frnklnlvr, but the NGC Registry only shows ONE 1949 S MS66 Star FBL and here's a full picture of the holder below.
I am disappointed that NGC made an error on the pop. report by missing one. Not like them to err on the report.
Thanks though, this information drove me re-image the coin and I will replace the registry pictures with some that better showcase this coins incredible colors
when held in hand.
Your '49-S is amazing! Yes, the pop report has never showed the PL 66FBL* for whatever reason. IMO it's kind of redundant to have the PL(proof-like) designation and a star but I've never seen the coin in hand so it very well may be worthy of both.
Franklin-Lover's Forum
Empty Nest Collection
Matt’s Mattes