Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Just Playing with a different lighting set-up Opinions Please

UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
Canon 40D
Canon Macro 100mm 1:2.8
26" Coin to back of camera (down from about 40")
6 Ott Lights, 3 are 6" from coin, 3 are 30" (Previously 3 at 40")

Copy Stand, Mirror Lock-Up, Remote Release

I still don't have the crisp focus I want

I'm thinking of going with a 150mm Macro...

image

I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.

Comments

  • Options
    relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,286 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks pretty good to me.
    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,787 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You might actually have crisp focus, but of a blurry coin. 6 Ott Lights is a lot of lights. You're getting a very diffuse picture with this many lights. This is fine if all you want to show is the color, but it is coming at the expense of the details of the coin, which look rather flat, and are made worse by the fact that late 50s Lincolns don't have any sharp details to begin with. Also wondering about what looks like a discontinuity in the outline from the brow to the forehead.
  • Options
    UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>wondering about what looks like a discontinuity in the outline from the brow to the forehead. >>



    Oops, I was photoshoping a hair off the coin there and must have slipped..
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    Looks nice. I like the color.

    Could have a little more contrast (lack of contrast likely because of too many lights), and a little less sharpening (the photo has unsharp mask artifacts), but otherwise a very nice photo.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    FlatwoodsFlatwoods Posts: 4,270 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wish you had picked a different coin to experiment with.


  • Options
    lsicalsica Posts: 1,759 ✭✭✭✭
    Thppppt on OTTs. If you want a really white source, use some daylight bulbs. If you like the coolness (actual heat temp, not color temp) of the OTTS, use daylight CFLS. Just be aware that CFLs are going to give you more diffuse and less direct light that incandescents, but if you're going for that ellusive color vs luster balance, you'll like that.
    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't think the focus is that bad, FWIW. I use a 180mm macro now and yes, you can get more detail and larger images. But focus is always a challenge.

    I don't like Ott lights either. I threw them in the trash. You will get better results with incandescent or halogen.

    Here's a colorful Lincoln I picked up recently on BST.
    Lance.

    imageimage

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file