PR VDB: Steve, look at this article from the Numismatist from Feb. 1910
DMWJR
Posts: 6,008 ✭✭✭✭✭
Doug
0
Comments
Nice read from 100 years ago,
Thanks for posting it!
You can find many old issues and interesting periodicals on Google Books for free. I especially enjoyed the advertisements in the back.
To be honest, it's hard to predict the long-term appeal of this coin in the face of changing designs, waning youth interest in numismatics, or the possible abolition of the cent. I mean, I've often thought that once the cent goes, so will collector interest, but there's plenty of evidence that would sem to contradict that as well. Collectors didn't just stop collecting half cents, two cent pieces, or any of the other obsolete denominations just because they stopped making them. And their values have always steadily risen. Personally, I think that there is enough going for this design, the Lincoln cent, with its history, its place in our nation's and the world's development, that there will always be an attraction that draws people to collect them, and draws collectors to cherish them.
Empty Nest Collection
Matt’s Mattes
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
WS
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
As for some 500 or so VDB proofs not being rare, I can see how this could be the case in 1910. Back then, there were not as many coin collectors, or for that matter, not as many people in general. The world population was about 1.7 billion, just a little over 1/4 of where we are today. Of those people, less of them percentage-wise were at a point at which coin collecting was a feasible hobby. A penny then was actual money. Most people in the U.S. did not have electric power and many did not have plumbing. Coin collecting outside of the wealthy was more of a niche market, and some of the price differences between common dates and rarities were ridiculously low compared to today, because of the lack of demand. 500 proofs would seem like a lot if there were only 400 people willing to pay more than ten to twenty cents for one.
<< <i>"No 1909 U.S. cents are rare." Easy to say in 1910. Consider how many of us balk at modern issues, when there are some that could potentially be future great rarities, such as platinum bullion or the First Spouse series, both of which have mintage figures far lower than the 1909-S-VDB cent.
As for some 500 or so VDB proofs not being rare, I can see how this could be the case in 1910. Back then, there were not as many coin collectors, or for that matter, not as many people in general. The world population was about 1.7 billion, just a little over 1/4 of where we are today. Of those people, less of them percentage-wise were at a point at which coin collecting was a feasible hobby. A penny then was actual money. Most people in the U.S. did not have electric power and many did not have plumbing. Coin collecting outside of the wealthy was more of a niche market, and some of the price differences between common dates and rarities were ridiculously low compared to today, because of the lack of demand. 500 proofs would seem like a lot if there were only 400 people willing to pay more than ten to twenty cents for one. >>
Well said.
You may also be overestimating the cost of the proofs at the time of issue. The mint sold the minor proof coin set (cent and nickel) for eight cents - two cents for the cent and six cents for the nickel.
I think these also lends credibility to the notion that only 500 (or 420) were actually released. There were many letters written to the Mint by collectors wanting to receive Proof examples of this coin after the fact. The Mint responded that they had IHC and non-VDB proof cents on hand, but no VDB cents. The VDB proofs have been highly sought after since they day they were released. Some say that their appearance, being so similar to mint state coins, caused them to be accidentally lost to circulation over the years. However, wouldn't that be true of the non-VDB Lincolns too? Look at the survival rate just with PCGS graded coins. If 2,000+ VDB proofs were issued, wouldn't you expect the survival rate to be even higher than that of the 1909 plain?
1909 IHC - Mintage 2,175, PCGS total graded 319
1909 Lincoln - Mintage 2,198, PCGS total graded 433
1909 VDB - Mintage ___, PCGS total graded 106
I'm certainly not trying to rehash a debate that has been ongoing here for years, but just thought it good to point this out. Even in 1910, the VDB proofs were, and always will be, rare.
<< <i>I think you might be underestimating the demand for the release of the most popular coin in history. There has never been more demand upon the release of a new issue than when the Lincoln cent was released.
1909 IHC - Mintage 2,175, PCGS total graded 319
1909 Lincoln - Mintage 2,198, PCGS total graded 433
1909 VDB - Mintage ___, PCGS total graded 106
I'm certainly not trying to rehash a debate that has been ongoing here for years, but just thought it good to point this out. Even in 1910, the VDB proofs were, and always will be, rare. >>
Doug and others:
It's always fun to rehash some of the interesting discussions we have had here concerning the 1909VDB MPL. Here are two for your review. The first covers the mintage issues but also has some cool pictures of the 3 key diagnostics (from 5 years ago) here
The second is about MPL mintage and how the Red Book has reported the counts over the years (from 2 1/2 years ago) here
Enjoy reading down memory lane.
Steve
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.