Home U.S. Coin Forum

1996-P Rotated Reverse Quarter Error

Found this one last night looking through a bunch of quarters. I am not sure how common these are but couldn't find much in the archives about modern Washingtons with a rotated reverse and didn't see many on eBay. As I don't have anything that would give me the exact degree of rotation I'd guess it's 30-40%? Just figured I'd share.

image

image

Comments

  • goodmoney4badmoneygoodmoney4badmoney Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would value it in present condition at $15 (or more), rotation of 80% +/- and it's a great example!
  • goodmoney4badmoneygoodmoney4badmoney Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would value it in present condition at $15 (or more), rotation of 80% +/- and it's a great example! >>


    I meant 80 degrees of rotation rather than a %
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,810 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cool. image

    I think I've heard of this one but it's not listed on the rotated die census.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • I found a 1989-P 25c with a 140º CW rotated die a couple years ago in heavily circulated condition. I put it up on Ebay starting at $9.99 and it ended around $125!

    Your coin looks to be about 120º CCW.
  • errormavenerrormaven Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭
    Looks to have an 80 degree clockwise rotation of the reverse relative to the obverse. Of course, there's no way of knowing which die actually rotated. When you have a compound or complex rotated die error that does provide this information, it's almost always the hammer die, which in this case is almost certainly the obverse die.

    I don't recall seeing a major rotated die error on a 1996-P quarter before.
    Mike Diamond is an error coin writer and researcher. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
  • hyf88hyf88 Posts: 294 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for the replies, this type of error is still a bit new to me. So, would it be safe to say that this type of error would be noticed early in the production run, allowing them to be fairly scarce? I am guessing the market for these tends to be quite small, limited to specialized collectors.
    And thanks for the site link, Cladking, it sure gives quite a range of dates and denominations to look for.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,810 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Thanks for the replies, this type of error is still a bit new to me. So, would it be safe to say that this type of error would be noticed early in the production run, allowing them to be fairly scarce? I am guessing the market for these tends to be quite small, limited to specialized collectors.
    >>



    I've never felt like these get the attention they deserve. I consider them varieties
    since they are fully repeatable once the dies settle into position but most of the hobby
    considers them errors.

    This particular date is likely pretty scarce since it's not on the list.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • CoinCrazyPACoinCrazyPA Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Cool. image

    I think I've heard of this one but it's not listed on the rotated die census. >>



    Thanks for that link
    Positive BST transactions: agentjim007, cohodk, CharlieC, Chrischampeon, DRG, 3 x delistamps, djdilliodon, gmherps13, jmski52, Meltdown, Mesquite, 2 x nibanny, themaster, 2 x segoja, Timbuk3, ve3rules, jom, Blackhawk, hchcoin, Relaxn, pitboss, blu62vette, Jfoot13, Jinx86, jfoot13,Ronb

    Successful Trades: Swampboy,

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file