Other than set completeness, am I really missing anything by not ordering a proof set this year?
I got a little mailer the other day from the Mint, informing me that the 2010 Uncirculated Set is now available. I have not checked, but I assume that the 2010 proof set is also available. I have been buying these sets for years and years, although there are certain years where I forgot to order, and therefore, my set has holes.
Over the weekend I was cleaning out my office at home, and I have a full self of these sets just stacked there, still in original mailing boxes, rather than in velvet-lined drawers. The value of the sets makes them worthy of a shelf rather than a numismatic cabinet.
How do people feel about the proof sets? Would I be missing anything by just ordering future dates that have significance to me (like to commemorate the year of a special event)? I have holes already, so the completeness factor is really not an issue. I just received the latest edition of the Whitman Guidebook to Proof Sets and it is spectacular, so I am a little torn.
What do people think about these sets?
Over the weekend I was cleaning out my office at home, and I have a full self of these sets just stacked there, still in original mailing boxes, rather than in velvet-lined drawers. The value of the sets makes them worthy of a shelf rather than a numismatic cabinet.
How do people feel about the proof sets? Would I be missing anything by just ordering future dates that have significance to me (like to commemorate the year of a special event)? I have holes already, so the completeness factor is really not an issue. I just received the latest edition of the Whitman Guidebook to Proof Sets and it is spectacular, so I am a little torn.
What do people think about these sets?
Always took candy from strangers
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
0
Comments
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
worthy of at least a purchase of one of each set. JMHO
Terry
<< <i>If you do not order one this year, you are missing the opportunity to commemorate the year of the Big One™. >>
I'd order two sets on that occasion....
...can't go wrong with the sliver proof sets imho.
<< <i>I think the redesign of the reverse of the Lincoln Cent makes the Mint Set and Proof Sets
worthy of at least a purchase of one of each set. JMHO
Terry >>
A "worthy" collectible, but I'm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES
<< <i>I think the redesign of the reverse of the Lincoln Cent makes the Mint Set and Proof Sets
worthy of at least a purchase of one of each set. JMHO >>
By the same token, one could say this, along with the end of the 50-State-But-Wait-There's-More Quarters program provides sufficient closure to make this the perfect opportunity for breaking away from the annual purchase of habit.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
You're missing a great opportunity to whine and hack about the quality of these coins!
The name is LEE!
focus on producing a very consistently flawless product!
sooo to keep from seeing empty holes I have to continue.