Home World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

Coin Show Newps

The Australian Numismatic Dealers Association held their show in Sydney this weekend an I was lucky enough to attend and pick up some nice coins.

Great Britain 1890 Maundy Set

image

Great Britain 1887 Shilling - I assume this is a matte proof?

image

A 1967 New Zealand/Bahamas 2c Mule

image
Successful trades with Syracusian, DeiGratia, LordM, WWW, theboz11, CCC2010, Hyperion, ajaan, wybrit, Dennis88 and many others.

Comments

  • wybritwybrit Posts: 6,988 ✭✭✭
    Great finds indeed. That maundy set looks superb.

    There is no mention of matte proofs being struck for 1887 in any of my references, so there is some other story behind the shilling, probably.
    Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,824 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Terrific Maundy set

    From the image, not sure what to make of the shilling

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭
    That shilling may be lacquered.
  • JCMhoustonJCMhouston Posts: 5,306 ✭✭✭
    Very nice Maundy set, I have not heard of an 1887 matte proof shilling either.
  • mnemtsas2mnemtsas2 Posts: 745 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for the comments, how can I tell if the shilling is lacquered or not? Other than looking very matte and white it doesn't look to have anything on the surface. Can anyone suggest a photo/angle I can take so that the people here who are wiser than me can see something?
    Successful trades with Syracusian, DeiGratia, LordM, WWW, theboz11, CCC2010, Hyperion, ajaan, wybrit, Dennis88 and many others.
  • RobPRobP Posts: 483 ✭✭


    << <i>Thanks for the comments, how can I tell if the shilling is lacquered or not? Other than looking very matte and white it doesn't look to have anything on the surface. Can anyone suggest a photo/angle I can take so that the people here who are wiser than me can see something? >>


    Get a decent glass on it, preferably illuminated. Any lacquering will result in blockages by the resin in recesses such as the date or the milled edge. If someoone has tried to remove it this usually remains in place as the effect of surface tension of the liquid means it doesn't penetrate a small depression and the surface area exposed being small relative to the quantity of lacquer present means that such places are harder to clean. An illuminated magnifier will also show a coated surface better as the appearance is different for lacquered, dipped or original surfaces. It isn't easy to explain in words, but most lacquered or formerly lacquered coins I have handled usually had a brownish tinge where the residue remained. You may also find that the milled edge has a slightly sticky feel to it where lacquer has filled the grooves.
  • mnemtsas2mnemtsas2 Posts: 745 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Robp, I did as you suggested and saw nothing. So I've got out the Dinolite and examined the coin for the last 10 minutes looking for some debris on the coin and can find exactly nothing. See some detail images below. Any other ideas what might be going on with this piece?

    image
    image
    image
    Successful trades with Syracusian, DeiGratia, LordM, WWW, theboz11, CCC2010, Hyperion, ajaan, wybrit, Dennis88 and many others.
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Maundy set looks great. So does the shilling, even if it ain't a proof.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
Sign In or Register to comment.