Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Guess the grade Morgan S Mints, 1887, 1889, 1898, 1899 grades post 23

blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
Looking for opinions on these Newps, all in PCGS plastic.

1887-S:

image
image

1889-S:

image
image

1898-S:

image
image

1899-S:

image
image
http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook

Comments

  • 2manycoins2fewfunds2manycoins2fewfunds Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭
    63
    62PL
    62
    63

    (I've always found it difficult to say PL or DMPL on pictures like these without seeing a ceiling fan reflected in the fields)image
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dang nice dollars Todd!

    65DMPL
    63DMPL
    63DMPL
    64DMPL

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • MarkInDavisMarkInDavis Posts: 1,724 ✭✭✭✭
    WAG

    64PL
    64DMPL
    64PL
    64PL
    image Respectfully, Mark
  • anablepanablep Posts: 5,161 ✭✭✭✭✭
    nicer than mine
    better than mine
    prettier than mine
    much nicer than mine


    image
    Always looking for attractive rim toned Morgan and Peace dollars in PCGS or (older) ANA/ANACS holders!

    "Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."


    ~Wayne
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,029 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My WAG
    64
    63PL
    64
    63
    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • joshieboijoshieboi Posts: 128
    1899s MS64-DMPL
    1898s MS64-DMPL
    1889s MS63-DMPL
    1887s MS65-PL

    Very Nice Morgs, She's banging, in the 1889s. Awesome set image
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    64PL
    63DM
    63PL
    63PL
    When in doubt, don't.
  • beartracks42beartracks42 Posts: 2,834 ✭
    My 2 cents worth:

    65PL
    65DMPL
    65PL
    65PL
    Gary
    image
  • kryptonitecomicskryptonitecomics Posts: 9,185 ✭
    I don't think it's possible to grade the coins due to the picture quality...what set up are you using? image


    Ok sorry couldn't resist image
    Kryptonitecomics Ebay Auctions
  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,952 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I don't think it's possible to grade the coins due to the picture quality...what set up are you using? image


    Ok sorry couldn't resist image >>



    iPhone.....
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • Al21Al21 Posts: 330 ✭✭✭
    64PL
    63DMPL
    63DMPL
    63DMPL

    Beautiful coins

    Successful BST transactions with WTCG, NH48400, evil empire,
    meltdown, timrutnat, bumanchu, 2ndCharter, rpw, AgBlox, indiananationals, yellowkid, RGJohn, fishteeth, rkfish, Ponyexpress8, kalshacon, Tdec1000, Coinlieutenant, SamByrd, Coppercolor
  • kryptonitecomicskryptonitecomics Posts: 9,185 ✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I don't think it's possible to grade the coins due to the picture quality...what set up are you using? image


    Ok sorry couldn't resist image >>



    iPhone..... >>




    Now I see your problem...you need the macro app image
    Kryptonitecomics Ebay Auctions
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63PL
    62DMPL
    62PL
    62PL
    *For Sale on Numismy* *For Sale on Ebay*
  • SullivanNumismaticsSullivanNumismatics Posts: 850 ✭✭✭✭
    '64
    '63
    '62
    '64

    www.sullivannumismatics.com Dealer in Mint Error Coins.
  • HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1887-S MS63 PL
    1889-S MS62 DMPL
    1898-S MS63 DMPL
    1899-S MS63 DMPL


    image
  • jmj3esqjmj3esq Posts: 5,421 ✭
    MS65DMPL
    MS63DMPL
    MS64DMPL
    MS64DMPL
  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How about a few more guesses before I release grades....
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • sweetwillietsweetwilliet Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭
    1887-S MS63 PL
    1889-S MS62 DMPL
    1898-S MS63 DMPL
    1899-S MS63 PL

    I really like that 89-s, looks like some real deep mirrors, good cameo, and the rim toning accentuate the contrast. Great group overall!! I did have to change at least one grade so I wouldn't guess the same as High Relief on all four. image
    Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    Will’sProoflikes
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,917 ✭✭✭✭✭
    terrific coins

    1887-s MS65

    Love the 1889-s and 64DMPL seems appropriate

    1898-S 63PL

    1899-S 64PL

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • golfer72golfer72 Posts: 3,588
    4,3,3,4
  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here are the grades in order:

    63PL

    63DMPL, rattler

    63DMPL

    63PL

    It wasnt until after I posted that I realized these were all 63's.
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thank you that was fun!

    bob
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,917 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, the concession speech will not be pretty

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Todd:

    I think they missed on the '87-S. In the photos it looks better than the other three, but what about in person?
    When in doubt, don't.
  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,952 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Todd:

    I think they missed on the '87-S. In the photos it looks better than the other three, but what about in person? >>



    You will see them next week to decide what you think. The 87 and 89 are free of any major hits. They are clean but a little baggy. The 89 has the hit where the chin meets the neck, but with a DMPl pop of 47 I can live with that.
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,917 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think the 89-s is without question the real rarity of the lot and DMPL was the right call. I am the Liberal on this one calling it a 64DMPL and that is okay. I think we all forget that DMPL fields make hits and contact marks far worse than they really are.

    The fields in the 87-s are not very deep- at least from the image and I am not being critical of the image- it is more of a plug as to why collectors need to see coins in hand before grading and buying- I thought the 87-s would possibly not even obtain a PL designation. It is an attractive coin, worthy of a better grade-unless there are issues that we are just not able to see- again, no reflection on the image

    Now we have the real problem in terms of grading the 98-s and 99-s- terrific coins- and perhaps the fields are strong enough to distinguish between DMPL and PL if seen in hand-

    Terrific coins

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...