Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Posting a few shots of Elizabeth proof coins and a take on the coin market..

I'm ambivalent about these coins, but I have high hopes that a couple of them will make it-to PCGS PR 65 CAM at least.

In defense of the carried away bidders on Ebay the other night, it isn't really at that easy to locate 1953 proof Elizabeth !!
coins that make it to PR 65 levels or better, and also demonstrate reasonable cameo devices.

The reason is that, regardless of the numbers minted, most all of them were kept in their original satin surfaced
containers that, combined with time and humidity, produced a lot of spotting and milky fields on the coins they
contained.

Additionally, as i noted earlier, only the first couple of dozen coins off fresh dies are going to produce heavy
cameo contrast-the premium quality that most collectors look for.

The examples I'm going to post are marginal at best. And they came from a set that the owners encased in
lucite holders to avoid the usually carbon spotting on the coppers and milky fields on the silver coins.

I paid $125 for this set and it's one of the nicer ones. So we aren't talking about huge layouts here.

But of the 11 coins in the set, I found only 2 that displayed nice cameo contrast and 3 that might make
PR 65 on the PCGS grading scale. So it ain't as easy as some might imagine.

I have a deep affinity for the 1953 Elizabeth Coronation set since I was stationed at RAF bases in the
country for about 2 years during that period and witnessed the coronation parade for Elizabeth !!,
albeit in a Guiness soaked stage that resulted in my being snapped off a conga line into the Trafalgar
Square fountain.

Was I smart enough to buy these babies up in their original red, satin lined cases, for about $10 U.S.?

Obviously, like so many short sighted collectors, NOT.

Yes, I bought a few Elizabeth tea spoons, saucers and such, and a mint set in plastic that quickly became a PVC
contaminated mess that is practically worthless- but nothing at all as astute and far sighted as cherry picking the
proof sets and storing the gem coins away.

Rob Pearce has commented on these sets, quite accurately, as being "common".

But I've got a standing order with him, and a couple of other dealers in England, to purchase for an appropriate
premium ANY 1953 proof coin with strong cameo contrast on both sides that will make at least the PCGS 65
CAM designation.

Anyway, here are a couple of the coins I'll be submitting, just to salvage, perhaps, a coin or two that will fit
into the Registry set I'm working on.

Not the best photography since I always have to tilt the coin to bring out the best contrast and color,
but hopefully you get the idea..

image

image
No,no- the kids and the cat are all right honey.
It's just that I got my PCGS grades.

Comments

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,744 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice crown, is the reverse up to the same standard?
    3d is hard to call for cameo at least on my computer.
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • I didn't mean to indicate that I was submitting the 3d for cameo contrast, rather for grade and color.

    Here's the reverse of the crown.

    As I said-marginal. The cameo is there; but lots of distractions.

    I'm also posting the obverse of the half crown and reverse of the half penny.

    Again a of field distractions on the half crown.

    When you tilt the coin the milky areas disappear but it will be interesting to see how PCGS treats it.

    Not kindly I imagine image


    image

    image

    image
    No,no- the kids and the cat are all right honey.
    It's just that I got my PCGS grades.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,843 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great story and witnessing the Coronation-

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • WWWWWW Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭
    Nice looking coins and an even better account of events waaaaay back then. image
  • 1960NYGiants1960NYGiants Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭✭
    ccn: my experience with similar looking Canadian pieces and PCGS is no 65s. The silver pieces look like they'll get a CAM or DCAM but at 64. I think the 3d + 1/2 are 65/66 candidates. Just my opinion from the photos.
    Gene

    Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
    Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors

    Collector of:
    Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
    Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
    My Ebay
  • Yes, I agree with that.

    Not much chance for the crown and half crown.

    I may try dipping a couple of pieces if I think it would help.
    No,no- the kids and the cat are all right honey.
    It's just that I got my PCGS grades.
  • flykiteflykite Posts: 147
    As the one who sold those British Empire coins last week, needless to say, I have been absolutely floored by the prices my coins are bringing! There is obviously a lot of pent-up demand for 1950's GB, NZ, and SA coins. My sales the last couple of months have exceeded anything I ever did with US coins.

    If any of you have high-quality raw goodies out there, and are looking to sell, get them slabbed, and throw the Krause catalogue into the recycling bin, as the price list is useless!

    The internet has certainly made the world much smaller, as I am selling "darkside" coins all over the Empire!

    Ed
  • You posted some very nice coins, Ed.

    And I'm sure you're aware that one newbie(35 feedbacks if I remember correctly) was responsible
    for the runup on several, if not most, of them.

    Looking forward to seeing more when you get them.

    Maybe "o...." will be on vacation or something image
    No,no- the kids and the cat are all right honey.
    It's just that I got my PCGS grades.
Sign In or Register to comment.