Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Opinions on this 1965 Topps Football unopened pack

stevekstevek Posts: 30,317 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Opinions on this 1965 Topps Football unopened pack. Thanks!

1. Legit unopened?
2. Could it contain a Namath? Is it the right series wrapper?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300424717550&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

Comments

  • JHS5120JHS5120 Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭
    I am rolling up my red flag!
    My eBay Store =)

    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." Dr. Seuss
  • SportsamericaSportsamerica Posts: 990 ✭✭
    Looked resealed to me..

    Cory
    ----------------------
    Working on:
    Football
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
    1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
    1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)

    Baseball
    1938 Goudey (56.25%)
    1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
    1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
    1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
    1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
  • diamondmandiamondman Posts: 2,020
    can't say pictures are out of focus especially the back of the pack. that in itself scares me. JMHO
  • stevekstevek Posts: 30,317 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just didn't have that "usual suspects" scammer look to it.

    He's got three other unopened packs up for auction. One a cello with Gifford on tiop - I know some here have warned about raw cellos with a star on top.
  • flatfoot816flatfoot816 Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭
    no thanks...that is a pretty rare pack and anyone selling a legit one is gonna take a bit more time in its presentation
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,858 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looked resealed to me..

    Yes, and very poorly at that...corner folds are wrong and the seal does not look at all original.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • stevekstevek Posts: 30,317 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>no thanks...that is a pretty rare pack and anyone selling a legit one is gonna take a bit more time in its presentation >>



    He did know enough to state "This contains the oversized cards which were only issued for one year, and a magic rub-off insert. Could contain a Joe Nameth rookie card"...so he certainly did some research on the pack.

    I'll admit, the possibility of a "babe in the woods" seller intrigued me and for the "right price" I was gonna take a shot at it...but perhaps not now after reading the replies. Considering the replies here, I now believe he likely intentionally misspelled Namath's name to give that "babe in the woods" impression.

    It's over $300 already.
  • stevekstevek Posts: 30,317 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Looked resealed to me..

    Yes, and very poorly at that...corner fold are wrong and the lighting and look of the scan reminds me of other resealed auctions I've seen before.. >>



    That's what almost fooled me I guess...I figured a scammer would have resealed the packs better, as funny as that sounds. LOL

    Thanks guys! - You saved me money...again! image

    EDIT: The 1963 pack is the one which isn't sealed that well - the one flap is loose.
  • TheCARDKidTheCARDKid Posts: 1,496 ✭
    One thing is, how often do you see empty wrappers of 65 Topps football? Not very often. And in good condition.

    I'd rather see the pack in person.
  • mojorobmojorob Posts: 392 ✭✭
    Just curious .......... what is the wrapper alone worth?

    Has to be well over a hundred bucks , doesn't it?
Sign In or Register to comment.