Home U.S. Coin Forum

How much is too much

I understand from reading the posts relating to coin photography that many of the best coin people take their raw images and spend time "post processing" them to arrive with a suitable product. Of the two images below, one has not been altered other than cropping and the other I sharpened and added some intensity. I tried not to go over the line between reality and absurdity. For those of you that keep a photo album of your coins, are the pictures altered to make them appear much better than they are?

image

image

Comments

  • mcarney1173mcarney1173 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If I am taking a photograph for my personal benefit, I would be attempting to make it look as close to the "in-hand look" as possible. The point of a picture is to capture something, and an overly edited picture does not capture anything. I usually take about a dozen photos of a coin, then look at them in comparison to the coin. I keep whichever looks the most realistic.

    I'm assuming this is certified and I think the focus isn't right. I can see that scratch on the slab at the bottom and that would indicate that you are not focused in enough.
  • mrpotatoheaddmrpotatoheadd Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭
    As long as your picture looks like the coin does in hand, I don't care if you use crayons.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My goal is to always show the coin as it looks in hand.
    Most times my coin looks much better than I could show in a pic with
    my limited skills and even more limited time to spend tinkering with a camera and lights.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,426 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like to see, and try to take, pictures of coins that look like coins and not cartoons. If the picture takes a few adjustments thats how it goes.

    Ken

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file