........PCGS CAC but no + toner Morgan

So assuming that both CAC and no + are accurate, that means it's somewhere between 65.5 and 65.84 ....................... right?
In any case, purty coin.
MS65 78-S

In any case, purty coin.

MS65 78-S

0
Comments
<< <i>ChrisRx, maybe it doesn't like you so it's not trying? >>
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
<< <i>The 'toning premium' for that 65 coin is many multiples of its value were it white. So, getting it slabbed as a 65+ isn't meaningful in terms of adding more value. >>
Agreed. That is why unless it is all over "perfect" in magnificent toning, I can not see justification for paying so much. I would rather have a DMPL anyways.
<< <i>So assuming that both CAC and no + are accurate, that means it's somewhere between 65.5 and 65.84 ....................... right?
>>
No, graders can't grade to the nearest 100th of a point. Hopefully, you already knew that
to grade out to 0.0001. Now you tell me you can't. It broke
an old man's heart.
Camelot
<< <i>So assuming that both CAC and no + are accurate, that means it's somewhere between 65.5 and 65.84 ....................... right? >>
CAC could be 65.4, that's still "solid for the grade".
A "+" could be a 65.7 with great eye appeal.
Just sayin'!
U.S. Type Set
Empty Nest Collection
what gash are you talking about?
Bruce Scher
Are you sure about this? I thought it had to be at least 1/2 way into the grade to get the CAC........
Larry L.
<< <i>Are you sure about this? I thought it had to be at least 1/2 way into the grade to get the CAC........ >>
Not positive but CAC green beans "A" and "B" coins. In my mind you don't need 65.5 for a B.