Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Cards: BIN/Auction Ratio Now Above 10-to-1



Search Return

Cards

Total Listings... 4,200,609

Auctions......... 337,814

BINs.............. 3,862,795



Search Return

Cards PSA

Total Listings...... 190,402

Auctions.............. 16,601

BINs................... 173,801


.........................................................................

Looks like sellers finally cracked the code.

Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.

Comments

  • yankeeno7yankeeno7 Posts: 9,253 ✭✭✭
    I just hope they crack the code for pricing otherwise they wont sell anything if they dont start listing items for FMV. Or at least have best offer option to hopefully get that FMV.
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>I just hope they crack the code for pricing otherwise they wont sell anything if they dont start listing items for FMV. Or at least have best offer option to hopefully get that FMV. >>



    Because so many people who sell on Ebay have zero profit motive, the market price is usually a price that realizes no profit for the seller. Seller who have a profit motive need to sell for above FMV, which is where the BIN comes into play.
  • i recall seeing a bunch of psa/dna autographs bin a month ago they still linger
  • corvette1340corvette1340 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭
    interesting ratios. Of course I would never know because I only search auctions. When all of the sellers using ridiculous BIN's stop selling altogether then it will revert back to auctions or they will starve. Or maybe they'll just hold onto their cards and the market price will go shooting up due to a supply shortage.

    If Bing Cashback didn't exist then none of these BIN's would EVER sell. Ebay is supposed to be an auction site not just another online store, that's what brought them the spotlight and all of the profits to begin with. There should be a totally different site for anything that isn't being auctioned.
  • Ebay will never go back to being an auction site. Too many sellers realized they can no longer make money with auctions. Thos sellers who need quick cash will still use auctions, while smart sellers will continue to mainly use BINs.
    www.sportsnutcards.com
    Specializing in Certified Autograph Cards, Rookies, Rare Inserts and other quality modern cards! Over 8000 Cards in stock now! Come visit our physical store located at 1210 Main St. Belmar ,NJ
  • burke23burke23 Posts: 1,475 ✭✭✭


    << <i>interesting ratios. Of course I would never know because I only search auctions. When all of the sellers using ridiculous BIN's stop selling altogether then it will revert back to auctions or they will starve. Or maybe they'll just hold onto their cards and the market price will go shooting up due to a supply shortage.

    If Bing Cashback didn't exist then none of these BIN's would EVER sell. Ebay is supposed to be an auction site not just another online store, that's what brought them the spotlight and all of the profits to begin with. There should be a totally different site for anything that isn't being auctioned. >>



    Call me cheap, but I agree. It doesn't bother me if people put a BIN at 2x what an auction for the same card goes for, just as they shouldn't be insulted when I make an offer at 60% of their price. I am sure there are BIN's w/ the Best Offer option that are older than my kid...who is 2 1/2. Do those folks even want to sell?

    Edit to add - check the completed sales (not listings)...what is the ratio of Bins/Stores to Auction? Certainly nowhere near 10:1...maybe 1:1 for what I look at? That may be generous to BINs
    Looking for rare Randy Moss rookies and autos, as well as '97 PMG Red Football cards for my set.
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,854 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i also like the concept of auctions-only, but with all the increased fees that ebay charges, you'd better be willing to lose money if you sell anything in an auction format. It's definitely a buyer's market now, and ebay, for better or worse, is morphing into an Amazon look-alike site.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Mickey71Mickey71 Posts: 4,261 ✭✭✭✭
    Corvette & burke23,
    I could not have said it better. I totally agree with every point you both made.

    Mickey71
  • hammeredhammered Posts: 2,671 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Too many sellers realized they can no longer make money with auctions. Thos sellers who need quick cash will still use auctions, while smart sellers will continue to mainly use BINs. >>




    I disagree. Buyers of collectibles prefer auctions to overpriced BIN's, and so auctions may grow even more appealing as they become fewer in number. I've had many recent auctions end far higher than my BIN would've been. Last week I sold a '77T set for $420 at auction. My BIN would've been around $200. It's not like it's a rare set, it just had some competitive bidding on the last day. I sold a 79T PSA 10 for $55 and based on the pop I expected around 20. I agree it can work the other way, too. I've had several auctions end quite a bit lower than I hoped, but they seem to be offset (and then some) by the bidding wars that still occur on items at auction.
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭

    We are about 2-years into JD's 3-year plan to fundamentally transform EBAY
    via "disruptive innovation."

    Sadly, for everybody involved, JD failed to read what Clayton Christensen -
    the academic father of DI - made pretty clear in his writings: You will almost
    always destroy an existing business, if you employ DI tactics. (Typical Bain
    Capital alum mistaken thought process. If it works for startups, it must work
    even better for an existing market leader, thought JD.)

    AMZN has always been JD's target. The problem is that he has not hit the
    target ONCE, but he keeps shooting anyway.

    Neither EBAY nor any public company can adequately grow numbers as an
    online-auction venue. JD did get that part right, but failed to understand that
    changing EBAY into an AMZN was simply neither possible nor needed by the
    retail marketplace. When I can get what I need from AMZN, why would I
    want to buy it from an EBAY seller?

    The silver lining - for collectors - in the tragedy is that AMZN has shown no
    interest in the collectibles market. This has created a "wholesale for everybody"
    atmosphere at EBAY that is just now being displaced.

    If AMZN were to make a move into collectibles/auctions, the market MIGHT well
    recalibrate and deliver reasonable pricing for buyers AND profitable transactions
    for sellers. The challenge is that AMZN absolutely KNOWS you cannot make easy
    money running an auction venue UNLESS you have a captive payment scheme
    (PayPal) that spits out "money for nothing" on every transaction.

    Further, the market has already decided that auctions of non-collectible items
    were just a passing fad. Since collectibles make up less than 10% of EBAY's
    listings, AMZN has, apparently, decided to let its incompetent competitor keep
    them.


    ..........................


    eBay Traffic at 6-Year Low for March Data

    By Ina Steiner
    AuctionBytes.com
    April 15, 2010

    eBay's traffic for the month of March was at a 6-year low compared to previous March numbers. Data provided by Nielsen show that eBay received 49.6 million unique visitors in March 2010, down over 18% from 61 million in March 2007, the peak year for March data.

    eBay CEO John Donahoe initiated a 3-year plan to turnaround the marketplaces business after taking the helm in 2008. But unless sales defy traffic trends, he may have a tough time convincing shareholders that the plan is working when he faces them at the company's annual meeting at the end of the month.

    It will be difficult for the CEO to blame the economy. Forrester Research pegged online retail sales as growing 11% in 2009. (It's forecasting similar growth rates for 2010.) And while Nielsen 2-year numbers reveal that eBay's traffic decreased 13% in March 2010 compared to March 2008, Amazon.com's traffic increased 17% for the same period.

    30

    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
  • Wow, thats some interesting numbers!

    I can understand where sellers would want to put BIN's because cards have been selling so low at auctions lately....

    Sure they're not going to sell much using BIN, but at least they won't be losing any money at auction.

    I would think that more auctions would come up since that free listing thingy, where if you list cards for 99 cents starting bid is free. I guess thats ebay way of trying to make people put their stuff up and make customers happy that they bought a $50 card for 5 bucks.... Its bad for sellers and buyer right now and hope things will get better in the near future.
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭

    "...auctions may grow even more appealing as they become fewer in number. I've had many recent auctions end far higher than my BIN would've been..........just had some competitive bidding on the last day.......I agree it can work the other way, too. I've had several auctions end quite a bit lower than I hoped, but they seem to be offset (and then some) by the bidding wars that still occur on items at auction...."


    //////////////////////////////////////////////////

    You are right. But, hit and miss results are really not what
    most sellers are looking for.

    The BIN/Auction ratio is certain to fluctuate until it hits its
    comfort zone; sellers with deep pockets are now in a spot
    to decide what that zone will be.

    If their is a settling point, I expect it will be in the 25/1 range -
    or worse - UNLESS EBAY becomes a more fun/reasonable place
    for sellers to operate.
    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.


  • << <i>i recall seeing a bunch of psa/dna autographs bin a month ago they still linger >>



    Ive been watching tons of graded 50's-60's cards of BIN's for 10 months and they are still lingering. With the small number of auctions, this is actually good news for reputable sellers who still use auctions. Because of the little competition they are getting nice prices.
  • BugOnTheRugBugOnTheRug Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭
    So Storm, if the cracks in the armor of ebay can't or won't be repaired, and Amazon is trenched firmly in place, do you see any viable true-auction company - existing or startup - that with a rational business plan taking over where ebay basically jumped ship?
  • schr1stschr1st Posts: 1,677 ✭✭
    I wonder what % of that is Burbank? What's scary is that at any given time, I have about 3000 cards listed in my eBay store. Not much in the grander scheme of things, but I'm a one man band with my listings.



    << <i>Search Return

    Cards

    Total Listings... 4,200,609

    Auctions......... 337,814

    BINs.............. 3,862,795



    Search Return

    Cards PSA

    Total Listings...... 190,402

    Auctions.............. 16,601

    BINs................... 173,801


    .........................................................................

    Looks like sellers finally cracked the code. >>

    Who is Rober Maris?
  • hammeredhammered Posts: 2,671 ✭✭✭


    << <i>eBay's traffic for the month of March was at a 6-year low compared to previous March numbers. Data provided by Nielsen show that eBay received 49.6 million unique visitors in March 2010, down over 18% from 61 million in March 2007, the peak year for March data. >>



    Perhaps the decline in traffic is correlated to the decline in auctions? Fewer auctions = fewer unique visitors? Cuz BINs are just boring. You buy what you need, ho hum, then you go away. Like you said, if Ebay is becoming just another Amazon, what's the point anymore? And what's the incentive for a new buyer to create an ebay account - so they can buy an ipod with the same BIN price they can find at Walmart? No more deals to be had. Auctions are what made Ebay unique and appealing. People like sorting through them, finding good deals. Can't do that with just BIN format. It makes sense to me that people have lost interest in the site.

    I just hope that by the time Ebay goes 100% BIN, they've spun off another site dedicated to auction-only, for collectibles and such.
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭

    "...if the cracks in the armor of ebay can't or won't be repaired, and Amazon is trenched firmly in place, do you see any viable true-auction company -existing or startup - that with a rational business plan taking over where ebay basically jumped ship? ...."

    //////////////////////////////////////////////


    I think it is possible, but not very likely.

    The challenge is nobody can figure out how to make money
    doing it.

    NO big public company can profit enough by trying it.

    NO little startup can spend enough to break in.

    NObody big has gotten mad enough at EBAY to punish them
    by jumping in. MSFT/GOOG/YHOO/AMZN and others have
    certainly looked at it, but crushing opponents for "free" is
    really not much of a motivator for public companies.

    With "financial reform" looming, it is possible that EBAY will
    spinoff PayPal for HUGE money, at some point, to avoid the
    regulators. That could cause a new crew to get back to
    basics, after the windfall was distributed to existing shareholders.
    (The pressure would be off AND they would still have the
    "leading" auction venue.)

    MA has been making moves that indicate they have some
    interest in some kind of online retailing. (V, also.) But, at
    this point, it looks like they really just want to make the
    credit-card transaction rake on sales that come from any
    merchandise portals they are involved in.

    MANY public companies would pay for the secret sauce, but
    so far nobody has invented it. Show them HOW to make
    money and they will pay you for the secret.


    I think we are likely pretty much stuck with EBAY for a long
    time to come.


    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
  • fandangofandango Posts: 2,622
    the BIN craze started when the BING cashback and other discount devices started....people set the price at $1000 because they knew the buyer may only pay $800 after discounts......BUT they never lowered the prices after these discounts disappeared....and they got used to selling a few items at high price, they started gravitating to this method, even if sales dried up..

    BIN and BING ...very similar on purpose?
  • corvette1340corvette1340 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭
    everything I buy, not just collectibles, is done knowing about how much I can get at auction RIGHT NOW. With that in mind, my buy price is set accordingly. Meaning if I think I can get $200 for something because the last 4 auctions have averaged $200, then I might pay $125-$150 for it. I don't understand what all of the BIN sellers are doing. Are their buy prices just too high or are they just greedy?

    Making money in any market requires work. Whether it's cars, boats, sportscards, etc...I work my ass off to find deals and close them. Then I go the extra mile when listing something. I provide a ton of scans, a lot of detail, and answer all questions. It's the formula for success in any retail sales business. You give the customer great support, become a top seller, and realize greater profits. As long as you buy stuff in the correct range, it's a foolproof business model. I start all of my listings at .99 with no reserve whether it's a $5 item or a $5000 item.
  • TonyCTonyC Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭
    Storm, what was the ratio before the changes?
    Collecting Tony Conigliaro
  • fiveninerfiveniner Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭
    I do not do as many auctions than most however I have used both options I would say overall I have made out better in the auction format than the BIN format and most of the time ending up obtaining a better price than if I would have used BIN.
    Tony(AN ANGEL WATCHES OVER ME)
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,567 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I recently sold a 1962 topps set that failed to get a bid at $2,995 via auction at $3,188 via BIN best offer. I had to reject 8 or 9 offers until the right one came around, but it sold pretty quickly.

    I believe that buyers are starting to realize that you have to sift through the BIN's to find product these days - and the BO option facilitates some back and forth. Ignoring BIN's completely at this point is probably a mistake - just use your same prospecting abilities as there are certainly deals out there in BIN-land.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭


    << <i>just use your same prospecting abilities as there are certainly deals out there in BIN-land. >>



    I've found some great deals, but they've all involved email negotiations to get the BIN price down.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • scotgrebscotgreb Posts: 809 ✭✭✭
    Storm, what was the ratio before the changes?

    Pardon me for jumping in . . . but I have informally tracked PSA listings (on ebay) for a while cuz that's nearly always a key word for me.

    If memory serves, the ratio has generally been about 2:1 i.e., 2 BINs for every 1 auction -- I didn't track the absolute numbers.

    Now that search is consistent with Storm's observation -- currently greater than 10:1

    Given the new pricing (free .99c listings) I would have assumed the trend to move in the other direction due to a flood of .99c auctions but apparently that is not happening.

    As an auction-buyer / BIN-seller, I'm having a tougher time buying -- but similar sales results.

    Longer term (assuming this continues) I expect this to slow/reduce my sales because I'll have less to sell as it is very hard (if not impossible) to make $ buying at BIN and reselling at BIN.

    Scott
  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    I wondered about this recently. I've not bought much on Ebay for several months and last week I noticed the number of PSA listings for, say, 1965 Topps was about 1/2, maybe even 1/3 of what it used to be for auction style listings. I figured with all of the changes that BIN'S were way up but did not anticipate the big drop in auctions.

    Folks, for all the griping about them - and I do it too - stores work. Stuff has been selling out of my rather small store like hotcakes. It has to be priced right, however.

    I actually think auctions still can work for certain items and if you list them in volume.
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • thunderdanthunderdan Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭
    eBay made very deliberate changes to the fee structure (final value fees) which made BIN sales LESS expensive than auction sales. Couple this with BINs having no risk (other than a nominal listing fee) vs. auctions since you either sell it at your price or you don't sell it (but you have no risk of selling it for FAR less than you wanted like you do in auctions), and this was a recipe that motivated many sellers to switch to the BIN format. With this shift, many buyers who had long known eBay as a place to find good deals through auctions curtailed or even stopped their usage. For example, if I'm selling a $500 item, the final value fees on BIN would be (12% on first $50=$6 + 6% on next $450=$27. Total=$33) and on auction would be (9% of final value fee capped at $50=$45). Even with their free insertion fees on auctions, the total cost to seller is still far superior on BIN items less than $500. Sure, their little promo on auctions with free insertions and capped fvf's at $50, but that only makes financial sense for items selling for $555 or greater. Much of the inventory on eBay is far less valuable than this.

    These fee changes are probably a major cause of the traffic drop on eBay, and they are a reflection of John Donahoe's attempt to compete against Amazon. He has not succeeded and probably won't, for many reasons, only one of which is that Amazon has much tighter control over the end-to-end customer experience. For example, if I'm a merchant selling on Amazon's marketplace, I better darn well ship quality product in a timely fashion. If I don't, they boot you off in short order. For Amazon itself, they do a fantastic job on assortment, pricing, shipping, and logistics--FAR superior to eBay.

    I think eBay will be around for a long time, and they'll find a way to carve out a portion of the market for BINs; however, Amazon has been, and will likely continue to take market share so long as they continue to provide a superior end-to-end customer experience.
    image


  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Storm, what was the ratio before the changes? >>



    ///////////////////////

    I dunno.

    Some of the late posted estimates may be correct.

    It is prolly apples/oranges though. With the new scheme
    of counting everything in CORE, previous ratios might
    not be too meaningful. The "good" info will come when
    we can compare todays 10-to-1 numbers with those
    we get as time passes.

    ............

    In tomorrow's conference call, JD will likely lightly/heavily
    address the current ratio AND what he thinks it means to
    his "transformation" efforts.

    .............................


    Today's Listing Counts (Top Three Sites, Excluding AMZN)



    eBay ........... 102,224,974.......... -376,459

    eCrater ......... 3,307,714 .... +4,256

    Bonanzle ....... 2,992,716 ..... +25,650


    Counts at both the moon and the ranch have benefited from
    the recent EBAY "changes."



    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭

    "...These fee changes are probably a major cause of the traffic drop on eBay, and they are a reflection of John Donahoe's attempt to compete against Amazon. He has not succeeded and probably won't, for many reasons, only one of which is that Amazon has much tighter control over the end-to-end customer experience. For example, if I'm a merchant selling on Amazon's marketplace, I better darn well ship quality product in a timely fashion. If I don't, they boot you off in short order. For Amazon itself, they do a fantastic job on assortment, pricing, shipping, and logistics--FAR superior to eBay...."

    ////////////////////////

    The March numbers noted were calcd before the scheme change.
    The traffic-trend has been DOWN and will continue to be DOWN.
    I dunno if it will get worse, but it will NEVER return to the heyday.


    AMZN is indeed VERY strict. Bad EBAY-sellers should not waste
    their time trying it; they will not make it.

    BUT, AMZN is not petty/arbitrary/ridiculous/stupid like EBAY is.

    The AMZN fulfillment scheme is second to none.

    When I need/want to buy something, AMZN and WMT are my
    choices. (WMT lets you order online and pickup at your closest
    store. The lines in rural areas are short or none; city lines are
    sometimes quite long. Lines are shortest late at night.)

    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.


  • << <i>"..


    AMZN is indeed VERY strict. Bad EBAY-sellers should not waste
    their time trying it; they will not make it.

    >>



    I went to amazon the other day to look for some cd's. I had trouble finding sellers with 100% feedback(unlike ebay). Most were around 95-96% which is considered not that great on ebay.

    Being amazon dont accept money orders/checks, OR paypal, i dont buy from that site.
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,144 ✭✭✭
    95-96% is actually pretty good. Some of the negatives I have gotten on Amazon not very well thought out, ie #1) Buyer didn't like the way a movie ended. He/She thought it should have ended differently. Buyer #2) Didn't realize you had to flip the disc over to get it to get to the rest of the movie. Buyer #3) Didn't like the songs on a CD (How can I account for their bad taste???).....Buyer #4) Thought I should give a refund, without them having to return an item. I don't know where they do business from, but I even think Wal-Mart would want the item back when you return it!!!!!! You get the idea.........Foolish negatives can help bring a seller's average down.



    << <i>Being amazon dont accept money orders/checks, OR paypal, i dont buy from that site. >>



    Amazon accepts Credit Cards which is actually the most foolproof way to buy something!
    Also bear in mind, the majority of people DO NOT leave feedback on Amazon. You are more likely to hear from the few disgruntleds than the many happy buyers. Thats the nature of the beast.


  • << <i> You get the idea.........Foolish negatives can help bring a seller's average down.

    Just the same with ebay.



    << <i>Being amazon dont accept money orders/checks, OR paypal, i dont buy from that site. >>



    Amazon accepts Credit Cards which is actually the most foolproof way to buy something!
    >>



    The problem with credit cards is, many cc users have low limits, especially with the new cc laws it is much worse. For instance i have a mastercard and have a $1000 a month limit. After i pay a few bills, there isnt much left to spend. And there are alot of people who cant get credit cards anymore due to stolen identity.
  • onebamafanonebamafan Posts: 1,318 ✭✭
    Yep..................i had a search return 5500 items, auctions were a total of 384.....................unreal!
  • thunderdanthunderdan Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i> You get the idea.........Foolish negatives can help bring a seller's average down.

    Just the same with ebay.



    << <i>Being amazon dont accept money orders/checks, OR paypal, i dont buy from that site. >>



    Amazon accepts Credit Cards which is actually the most foolproof way to buy something!
    >>



    The problem with credit cards is, many cc users have low limits, especially with the new cc laws it is much worse. For instance i have a mastercard and have a $1000 a month limit. After i pay a few bills, there isnt much left to spend. And there are alot of people who cant get credit cards anymore due to stolen identity. >>



    Amazon accepts more than just credit cards. The accept debit cards, or you can have purchase taken right out of your checking account.
    image




  • << <i>Also bear in mind, the majority of people DO NOT leave feedback on Amazon. You are more likely to hear from the few disgruntleds than the many happy buyers. Thats the nature of the beast. >>


    That has been my experience. I usually get feedback from 70-80% of my buyers on eBay, but I have not gotten any feedback from the 5 or 6 sales I've done on Amazon. I have gotten some very complimentary pms from buyers, though. image

    As to the differences between eBay and Amazon, here's an experience I had yesterday. I had been looking for some sports-related DVDs and searching the BINs on eBay. I finally found one of the DVDs at the lowest possible eBay BIN price (including free shipping) and was ready to hit the Buy It Now button. But just for grins, I went and checked for the same DVD on the Amazon Marketplace. I found it for $1.52 less (shipping included) on Amazon, FROM THE SAME SELLER I WAS GOING TO BUY FROM ON EBAY!!! image So I ordered it through Amazon and eBay lost out on the final value fee and the Paypal fee.
    "It's not so important who starts the game but who finishes it."
    - John Wooden
Sign In or Register to comment.