Testing my new scanner

I need some practice with this thing. I bought a Epson 810 because the wife wanted to print pictures.
Any advice on scanning?



Any advice on scanning?



Knotty Hobby Woodworks
Vintage Rookies
Vintage Rookies
0
Comments
I hate the thought of me even scanning a card, but yet I still paid about 500 bucks for scanner, but haven't used it once!
Keep up the great work
<< <i>They look good to me...
I hate the thought of me even scanning a card, but yet I still paid about 500 bucks for scanner, but haven't used it once!
Keep up the great work
Why would you pay $500 for a scanner??
<< <i>
<< <i>They look good to me...
I hate the thought of me even scanning a card, but yet I still paid about 500 bucks for scanner, but haven't used it once!
Keep up the great work
Why would you pay $500 for a scanner?? >>
He doesn't own a $500 scanner
<< <i>
<< <i>They look good to me...
I hate the thought of me even scanning a card, but yet I still paid about 500 bucks for scanner, but haven't used it once!
Keep up the great work
Why would you pay $500 for a scanner?? >>
Because it looked pretty and it seemed like a good idea at the time...
Are you scanning to sell?
If you are, then buyers might want to get a better look at the corners. Your 68 Ryan (nice card, BTW) doesn't work well on the white background. I'd scan it against black like in your 3rd scan, edges and corners become clear. See if your scanner has a depth setting. Sometimes you can adjust the depth or whatever they call it so it focuses clearly on the card inside the holder and not the surface of the slab (I can't do that on mine because I don't have a $500 one like Gio). And make sure to always include scans of the entire slab (like you did), otherwise buyers might suspect you are up to something. And I guess if it's a high dollar card, you should scan the back as well.
When scanning include entire slab, and put something behind the card to contract the card so people can see the corners clearly.
----------------------
Working on:
Football
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)
Baseball
1938 Goudey (56.25%)
1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>They look good to me...
I hate the thought of me even scanning a card, but yet I still paid about 500 bucks for scanner, but haven't used it once!
Keep up the great work
Why would you pay $500 for a scanner?? >>
Because it looked pretty and it seemed like a good idea at the time... >>
BS to the $500 scanner... Unless you paid for it 10 years ago.
----------------------
Working on:
Football
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)
Baseball
1938 Goudey (56.25%)
1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
Here's an example of a scan from a CCD scanner. You can really see the difference in the clarity of the label.