Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Some thoughts on using PCGS and NGC population reports for die varieties.

RWBRWB Posts: 8,082 ✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
[Deleted to save space for homeless electrons.]

Comments

  • LoveMyLibertyLoveMyLiberty Posts: 1,784 ✭✭✭
    Wasn't this Fermat's Last Theorem?
    image
    My Type Set

    R.I.P. Bear image
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think if you want truly accurate variety population data, ANACS should be included as well- many VAMmers I know use them for all but the most valuable VAMs, including me. I also use them for die varieties on other denominations as well, as I don't trust NGC, and $25 at PCGS is too expensive for many of them...
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • RWBRWB Posts: 8,082 ✭
    Excellent suggestion.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...