Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

(2) 1960 D 5C Jeffersons......will either of these make 66 ? opinions please


Thank you in advance........

imageimage
imageimage

Comments

  • Options
    morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, to me neither one would grade 66.
    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • Options
    GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Only 28 have graded at MS66. If you DO find one, I'm interested. Even more so if it's FS. image
  • Options
    19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,475 ✭✭✭✭
    MOP is no.

    I'd wager MS64 tops if even that.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • Options
    bfjohnsonbfjohnson Posts: 538 ✭✭✭
    Don't normally grade Jefferson nics but agree with the no.
  • Options
    BigDowgieBigDowgie Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭✭
    I'll ditto the no reply on both. However (and I should know this), is it the 1960-D that has the "Bar-0". Sure looks like these have the die wear or gouge ove the 0 in 1960.

    Dowgie
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They look like 64s to me, due to obverse small marks and terrible strikes.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    Tdec1000Tdec1000 Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭
    the monticello is almost completely gone in the middle of the building. I would venture MS 63 with the nicks and ticks plus the weak reverse strike. Could possibly go 64 depending on luster.
    Awarded the coveted "You Suck" Award on 22 Oct 2010 for finding a 1942/1 D Dime in silver, and on 7 Feb 2011 Cherrypicking a 1914 MPL Cent on Ebay!

    Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
  • Options
    SUMORADASUMORADA Posts: 4,797
    I'll ditto the no reply on both. However (and I should know this), is it the 1960-D that has the "Bar-0". Sure looks like these have the die wear or gouge ove the 0 in 1960.

    Yes they do, also the "BERT".
  • Options
    BearBear Posts: 18,954 ✭✭
    Does not seem capable of making a MS-64. Way too soft a strike
    on both coins ,as well as micro scratches and general lack of pizzas.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • Options
    TennesseeDaveTennesseeDave Posts: 4,743 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Are they always that weakly struck on the reverse?
    Trade $'s
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 28,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They're obviously different stages of the same die. #2 is later than #1.

    This is a tough date and strikes are often poor but I think strike will preclude either
    from making 66. I like the #1 obverse and the #2 reverse. If you've got more from
    these dies keep looking. You may be on the right path.
    Tempus fugit.
  • Options
    tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    I was under the impression that for any coin to make 65 or higher the strike had to be good
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 28,351 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I was under the impression that for any coin to make 65 or higher the strike had to be good >>




    This isn't too bad for the date.
    Tempus fugit.
  • Options
    cupronikcupronik Posts: 773 ✭✭✭
    IMO neither 60-D Nickel will grade MS-66.

    There are lots of BU rolls of this date available and the strike varies from atrocious to attractively well-struck. If you want to find a nice 60-D Nickel, examine as many 1960 gov't-issued mint sets as you can. I have found examples that would undoubtedly grade MS-65 (shot '66,
    though I haven't personally made an MS-66!)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file