Will submitting PCGS holders that are CAC stickered

Walmann

for consideration as a plus designation be considered as a review or crossover or merely a reholder without plus consideration?

JJM

+1 and I better get another

there is going to be a field day of senarios on this board
and its only 4 pm eastern day of announcement !

pmac

The obvious outcome of the + grade will make CAC outmoded. I'm sure that the CAC premiums will be passed onto the + grades.

19Lyds

Aside from developing the Secure Plus™ grading, the CAC sticker has little meaning to PCGS as many have demonstrated. In other words, an NGC 64 CAC coin is not guaranteed to cross as a PCGS 64 coin.

coinguy1

<< <i>The obvious outcome of the + grade will make CAC outmoded. I'm sure that the CAC premiums will be passed onto the + grades. >>

People use CAC for at least a couple of different reasons. One is to get a second, independent opinion. That, many will still do, even if a coin has a plus designation. Another is to make the coin eligible for CAC bids, which many will also still want to do.

19Lyds

<< <i>

<< <i>The obvious outcome of the + grade will make CAC outmoded. I'm sure that the CAC premiums will be passed onto the + grades. >>

People use CAC for at least a couple of different reasons. One is to get a second, independent opinion. That, many will still do, even if a coin has a plus designation. Another is to make the coin eligible for CAC bids, which many will also still want to do. >>



I though that most dealers did CAC for survival?