Would you say this coin has lots of eye appeal?

Marauderrt10

I think it did, but apparently not enough to get the NGC star....

tightbudget

Just so-so to me. Certainly not enough "oomph" for the star though.

Broadstruck

commoncents05

<< <i> >>






-Paul

erickso1

<< <i>

<< <i> >>






-Paul >>



Awesome. Well played.

Marauderrt10

<< <i> >>

Marauderrt10

<< <i>Just so-so to me. Certainly not enough "oomph" for the star though. >>

i guess you have to see it in hand. It has the luster of an 81-S certainly uncommon on 87-Ps.

Broadstruck

Marauderrt10, I'm glad you have a good sense of humor!

doh

Not enough for a star...should have several colors for a star IMHO

bestclser1

<< <i>

<< <i>Just so-so to me. Certainly not enough "oomph" for the star though. >>

i guess you have to see it in hand. It has the luster of an 81-S certainly uncommon on 87-Ps. >>

Chris,ALL the BEST Battle Creek coins,i know it was a few years ago,were 87-Ps,plenty luster and pop.You do have a good sense of humor as well.

dizzyfoxx

Does absolutely "0" for me.

mozin

The toning does not impress me, so no star from NGC.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

lkeigwin

Not impressed, sorry.
Lance.

ambro51

Seems like Ms. Morgan was looking at a Gold Dollar and said "Gee, I wish I was one of those, a nice sweet size 2 blonde, instead of a 350 pound bus driver"


hey, all kidding aside, if YOU like it, thats all that counts. really!

291fifth

No.

Rollerman

<< <i>Not enough for a star...should have several colors for a star IMHO >>




But I have an 1880 S in MS65 that is white that has the star. I've always assumed it indicated high quality for the grade? Am I incorrect?
Pete

gsaguy

I bought a number of 100% obverse gold-toned Morgans through the years. Add good luster and they are very attractive.

ColonialCoinUnion

<< <i>Not enough for a star...should have several colors for a star IMHO >>



Really?

Marauderrt10

<< <i>Marauderrt10, I'm glad you have a good sense of humor! >>