Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Let's play the bump game... contestants have your answers ready

I am planning on sending these in for reviews and wondered what you guys think... any 8.5's or dare I say 9's?

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Thanks

mathew
baseball & hockey junkie

drugs of choice
NHL hall of fame rookies

Comments

  • jimradjimrad Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭
    Sorry Mathew but I doubt it on those except maybe the Kurri.
    Remember that centering is key on getting a bump.
    Positive transactions with: Bkritz,Bosox1976,Brick,captainthreeputt,cpettimd,craigger,cwazzy,DES1984,Dboneesq,daddymc,Downtown1974,EAsports,EagleEyeKid,fattymacs,gameusedhoop,godblessUSA,goose3,KatsCards,mike22y2k,
    MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
  • StatmanStatman Posts: 597 ✭✭✭
    You might get a bump on one or two - I agree on the Kuri and maybe the Coffey, but for the most part it looks like they are graded pretty fairly.
  • GarabaldiGarabaldi Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭
    I would say the Coffey and then maybe the Kurri.
  • 54topps54topps Posts: 1,145 ✭✭✭
    Hi Mathew,
    I'd say maybe a bump on the Stastny, Kurri, and Coffey. The others could be 8.5's but that would just be the luck of the grader you get.
  • Mickey71Mickey71 Posts: 4,261 ✭✭✭✭
    From my experience- centering is not the key. Corners Corners and did I say CORNERS.
  • artistlostartistlost Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭
    I should clarify. I am not looking at these cards for a full grade bump. Just maybe a bump to 8.5

    thanks for the insight and please keep it coming.

    mathew
    baseball & hockey junkie

    drugs of choice
    NHL hall of fame rookies
  • gameusedhoopgameusedhoop Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭✭
    Stastny, Kurri, and Coffey

    Although it is hard to guess not seeing the backs. Some OPC corners look much worse when flipped over.
  • jimradjimrad Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭
    here is what it says ----
    Half-Point Grades: Cards that exhibit high-end qualities within each particular grade, between PSA Good 2 and PSA Mint 9, may achieve a half-point increase. While PSA graders will evaluate all of the attributes possessed by a card in order to determine if the card may be eligible, there will be a clear focus on centering.

    Generally speaking, a card must exhibit centering that is 5-10% better, at minimum, than the lowest % allowed within a particular grade. It is important to note that there may be cases where the overall strength of the card, such as the quality of the corners and print, will give the card the edge it needs despite the fact that it may exhibit only marginal centering for the grade. This is especially true for cards that find themselves within the bottom half of the PSA 1-10 scale.

    Finally, keep in mind that qualifiers will not apply to grades that achieve the half-point increase since, by definition; these cards have to exhibit high-end qualities within the grade in order to warrant consideration. For example, there will not be cards graded PSA NM-MT-Plus 8.5 OC or PSA EX-MT-Plus 6.5 PD since the half-point is reserved for high-end cards within each grade.
    Positive transactions with: Bkritz,Bosox1976,Brick,captainthreeputt,cpettimd,craigger,cwazzy,DES1984,Dboneesq,daddymc,Downtown1974,EAsports,EagleEyeKid,fattymacs,gameusedhoop,godblessUSA,goose3,KatsCards,mike22y2k,
    MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
  • bkingbking Posts: 3,095 ✭✭


    << <i>I should clarify. I am not looking at these cards for a full grade bump. Just maybe a bump to 8.5

    thanks for the insight and please keep it coming.

    mathew >>



    I'd say the two in the old flips (with the grade stuff all on 1 line) stand a chance at a .5, but the others look fairly graded to me.
    ----------------------
    Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
    ----------------------

    Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
  • Mickey71Mickey71 Posts: 4,261 ✭✭✭✭
    Jimrad,
    I know what was written regarding the .5 criteria; I just don't see it being that way. All of my review subs were graded heavily upon corners. I sent in well centered stuff. The stuff that was nearly perfectly centered did not have any advantage in the subs I sent in.
  • MorgothMorgoth Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
    Agreed Mickey, my first and only 8.5 review was at the National and the grader came out and told me that centering is not a priority. They are looking for cards with no damage first and great eye appeal second. Good corners, clean edges and original gloss count more than centering.
    Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
Sign In or Register to comment.