Your grading opinions on this Greyside Dollar please

An upgrade from a VF that I traded in...curious as to your grade.







One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
0
Comments
I'm looking for a 1952 version of that.
Raw BU.
While on the subject...Any opinions on the grade of this 50cent Canadian?
I picked this up sight unseen from Apmex last July went they were blowing out all Numismatic Items.
I paid $12 for it.
A little tough to tell because of that very nice toning... I don't see any wear on the cheekbone or other high spots.
I thought mine would qualify as UNC-hope it does.
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
1937 50c about au55/58
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Ah coinkat, can you extrapolate? Perhaps I might not have jumped on it so quickly if I had known that.
There is an area of strong contrast-I got lazy and didn't re-do the image but the contrast is not hiding anything.
DoubleEagle, I like your opinion.
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
not sure what grade you'd get for it, probably ms63-64?
Well, at least you sent them in and got them graded-probably more than I'm going to do.
At this point the grade is more for my own edification-certainly have no intention of
selling-but if I did, I wouldn't hesitate to send them in to be slabbed. (ach, cough, choke-
I said it. Whew, that wasn't so hard.)
Thanks, Colin. My dealer had it marked MS63 but I've seen him make mistakes in, errr, judgement before.
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
Thanks...
The coin shows so much better in hand. There's a good amount of luster
under that overall even toning.
Though I'm not new to the concepts of Photography. I'm finding that
coin photography is a whole new ball of wax.
What I was trying to get at- the contrast in the image has a bright area in the fields in front of the forehead of George V to the top of the crown. While the coin has an MS look, I would rather see it in hand before assigning a numerical grade-
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Understood.
I meant to add and seemingly forgot that the contrast above the forhead is not hiding any meanies...
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
This is due to the fact that these two dates when delivered from the Mint, came in rolls, not in bags.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>I don't know how TPGs are grading these now, but I sent in two original 1935's a few years ago that I thought were locks at MS65...they came back as 63's. I haven't sent in a Canadian dollar since. Both of the coins have nice lustre and few marks, but they alsohave some streaks in the toning that are not scratches, but maybe the grader took them as such. Here's one of the coins, my photos are not the best...
US tpg's ms63 because of muted luster.
Canada's ICCS perhaps an ms64.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.