simple question -- you can have one of the 2 -- which do you choose?

Say you finally get a nice card that you were waiting for.
It was a tough one, but you get a surprise and find 2 of them. You can only keep one. Its a low pop card. Lets say 3 10's 12 9's 29 8's.
You have a choice.
PSA 9 (OC) or PSA 8 .
Which do you choose and why ? For all sake and purposes there are no extreme circumstances and the cards recieved the grade they should have....
?
It was a tough one, but you get a surprise and find 2 of them. You can only keep one. Its a low pop card. Lets say 3 10's 12 9's 29 8's.
You have a choice.
PSA 9 (OC) or PSA 8 .
Which do you choose and why ? For all sake and purposes there are no extreme circumstances and the cards recieved the grade they should have....
?
Buying:
Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
0
Comments
I'm really surprised PSA still uses the qualifiers. From the very beginning, collectors have always preferred NQ cards and the sell prices have always reflected this.
Having a card with a qualifer makes it as undesirable as a card w/o a qualifier 2-3 grades lower, so why not just give the card that grade?
Maybe this affects older, vintage cards differently. Since I've always dealt with cards from the 80s-present, I wouldn't know.
I agree with the rest.
NQ
...............
I have a 9 (OC) that is perfectly centered on the front.
The back is waaaayyyy off.
The value of the card is MUCH less than that of an NQ 8.
do you think we all agree because of the registry taking -2 for OC...
or would u agree anyway
Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
I always thought that the NQ designation on the submission form told them to not use Quals and grade down instead. Is that not correct?
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." Dr. Seuss
Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
I think the 9 (OC) might have a grade weight of 7 or even 6.
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>psa 9(oc) = PSA 7 unqualified >>
Not automatically. Only as far as registry points. It would depend on how much off center- if the centering is at the tolerance of a straight 5 it could go down 4 grades.
Given the pops on this scenario I'd rather take the straight 8. But if there were no 10's, no 9's and and a different issue (like '54 Wilsons, that have almost no border) it would depend on the card.
My understanding, and I could be wrong, is if the card can be taken down one grade in order to ditch the qualifier they will do that automatically, but if it's 2 grades or more and no qualifiers hasn't been requested they will give it the OC.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
So, I'm with those who wouldn't want the 9OC.
But, just wanted to add - not all 8s NQ are created equal.
Just look at this 8NQ - I wouldn't hit it!
On the grading? Bad day at the office?
mike