Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Crossover Results

Most of these were SGC 88s, but the Hodges and a couple of the 68s were SGC 92s. The 75 Brett was an off brand 9. I am quite pleased with 59 Aparicio A.S..

Description Type Country
1 1 16259042 MG: MINIMUM GRADE 1959 TOPPS 475 JACK HARSHMAN Card US
2 1 16259043 MG: MINIMUM GRADE 1959 TOPPS 505 TONY KUBEK Card US
3 1 16259044 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1959 TOPPS 560 LUIS APARICIO ALL STAR Card US
4 1 16259045 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1967 TOPPS 228 GIL HODGES Card US
5 1 16259046 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1967 TOPPS 240 NL BATTING LEADERS M.ALOU/F.ALOU/R.CARTY Card US
6 1 16259047 NEAR MINT-MINT+ 8.5 1968 TOPPS 221 BRAVES TEAM Card US
7 1 16259048 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1968 TOPPS 144 JOE MORGAN Card US
8 1 16259049 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1968 TOPPS 27 GIL HODGES Card US
9 1 16259050 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1968 TOPPS 47 RALPH HOUK Card US
10 1 16259051 N6: MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENT 1968 TOPPS 562 JIM BOUTON Card US
11 1 16259052 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1968 TOPPS 476 WOODY WOODWARD Card US
12 1 16259053 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1971 TOPPS 535 CURT FLOOD Card US
13 1 16259054 NEAR MINT-MINT+ 8.5 1969 TOPPS 147 LEO DUROCHER Card US
14 1 16259055 MG: MINIMUM GRADE 1960 TOPPS 255 JIM GILLIAM Card US
15 1 16259056 NEAR MINT+ 7.5 1975 TOPPS 228 GEORGE BRETT Card US

Comments

  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,145 ✭✭✭
    Were these crackouts and submitted raw, or submitted in the SGC slab?

    I withdraw the question due to stupidity.......maybe you should have cracked these out instead of submitting in the slab.....
  • vladguerrerovladguerrero Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭


    << <i>maybe you should have cracked these out instead of submitting in the slab..... >>



    always
  • TrevmoTrevmo Posts: 201 ✭✭
    I would crack them out as well and submit raw. I think if you send in crossovers, the company looks at it a little harder because the other companies may have lower standards. JMO
    Collecting Ozzie Smith PSA 10's, 1949 Bowman PSA 5's, and 1949 Bowman PCL'S in any grade!
  • Mickey71Mickey71 Posts: 4,261 ✭✭✭✭
    Lower $ cards I would just crack. Expensive stuff---leave it in the slab.
  • cpettimdcpettimd Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭
    I am not partial to SGC or PSA; but I think SGC has equivalent and possibly tougher standards - that seem to be very, very consistent (especially with corners and edges). I see that they are now tougher on centering, and I think they have adopted PSA type criteria on the centering lately.
    Collecting Clemente master (#6) and basic PSA registry sets, Hank Aaron master and basic sets, Mantle oddball issues, 1970's mega decade HOFs, 1967 Topps pin ups, and high grade Topps Clemente and Aaron. Numerous transactions with over 100 board members.


  • << <i>I am not partial to SGC or PSA; but I think SGC has equivalent and possibly tougher standards - that seem to be very, very consistent (especially with corners and edges). I see that they are now tougher on centering, and I think they have adopted PSA type criteria on the centering lately. >>



    Thats also been my experience. Very tough to get high grades from sgc these days.
  • markj111markj111 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭
    I never crack out the first time.
Sign In or Register to comment.