Options
1961 Phillies Cigar Mickey Mantle

I picked this card up - but to be honest - had never seen it before.
Back in 1961, Phillies Cigar company had redemption program where if ya sent in 20 cigars bands and $3.39, ya got this photo and a baseball glove.

I'm pretty sure some of you out there may have this, but it was new to me.
mike
Back in 1961, Phillies Cigar company had redemption program where if ya sent in 20 cigars bands and $3.39, ya got this photo and a baseball glove.

I'm pretty sure some of you out there may have this, but it was new to me.
mike
Mike
0
Comments
<< <i>Ive never seen that card either, Mike. It's a great looking card of the Mick! Do you have any idea what they sell for? I wouldnt mind one for my own collection. >>
I paid 78 bucks for it Barry.
The Standard Catalog of BB has it listed as 1961 but I believe the promotion ran for a few years - it lists the picture - $125 nm.
It's kind of large - so I can see why some wouldn't want it (6.5x9"). It's a photo and not truly a card.
mike
edit: here's the ad:
1935 National Chicle
1961 Golden Press
1962 Bell Brand Dodgers
Top 200 cards in the hobby
Top 250 cards in the hobby
All time lakers
All time Dodgers
1957 Disney Characters
1965 Donruss Disneyland
1966 Get Smart
Brian
<< <i>
<< <i>Ive never seen that card either, Mike. It's a great looking card of the Mick! Do you have any idea what they sell for? I wouldnt mind one for my own collection. >>
I paid 78 bucks for it Barry.
The Standard Catalog of BB has it listed as 1961 but I believe the promotion ran for a few years - it lists the picture - $125 nm.
It's kind of large - so I can see why some wouldn't want it (6.5x9"). It's a photo and not truly a card.
mike
edit: here's the ad:
I'm sure that Mantle display piece would bring a pretty penny these days......
<< <i>I'm sure that Mantle display piece would bring a pretty penny these days >>
I agree!
It would brings a tidy sum!
Perhaps one will come up down the road?
mike
Collector of Pittsburgh Pirates cards for a slightly less stupid reason.
My Pirates Collection
And it's a lot scarcer than that. Factors mitigating against it attaining even greater value are, as mentioned, its size, plus there is no indication of the issuer on the piece.
I concur with everything Bob said - I just reread the OP and realized I used the word "card" as such - which as I said in the 2nd post - it's a heavy stock photo card and relatively large.
As I/Bob stated - it's 6.5x9" - and as I alluded - probably not as popular - but for people like me who collect all kinds of stuff to include T3s - that's OK.
Plus, I'm gonna frame it - it does have a very slight crease inside the pic which the seller didn't mention; he's a reputable guy and I think it missed him - but to be honest - I bid accordingly - and I think the price was right for this rather rare but low demand item.
I'll probably pull the trigger on the ad page from a mag since I would probably never find it on my own by thumbing thru old mags in an antique store e.g.
Thanx for all the input - it's always nice when ya see something new (to me anyways)!
mike
Steve
<< <i>Outstanding pickup!
Steve >>
Thanx Steve
Had you ever seen this from your "shop" days?
Many have mistaken it for a 'team photo' or something - but usually team photos are not this large to my knowledge - the Yankee photos that I got in the 70s were more like 4x6?
mike
Did anyone see the lady who was a batboy for the Yankess in 1963 on the Antiques Road show last night? She had some awesome Mantle stuff -- including a bat he gave her after hitting a homerun! The estimate value of the bat alone was $35,000 if I remember correctly...
edit...I think too big for psa to grade
<< <i>Sweet card. I have two of them...thought they might be from 1964. I also have a two page ad for it. Posted pics I think of it last year here. Will probably get them graded by PSA if they will grade it as I am grading my oddball Mantle's now. Striking image and nice color on this oversized card.
t...I think too big for psa to grade >>
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
PSA currently does NOT have a holder large enough.
Largest holder is the T-3 Holder - 5 3/4" x 8"
<< <i>Sweet card. I have two of them...thought they might be from 1964. I also have a two page ad for it. Posted pics I think of it last year here. Will probably get them graded by PSA if they will grade it as I am grading my oddball Mantle's now. Striking image and nice color on this oversized card.
edit...I think too big for psa to grade >>
Thanx king.
Based on the sale of ads for this product from '64 and '65 - and the fact that the Standard Catalog of BB lists it as 1961 tells ya either they're wrong on the date or the ad ran for a few years - perhaps during the season?
As I've said - this card - due to its size - is not popular - but one would think a "must" for the Mantle collector.
I'm planning on having the pic framed - and still not sure if I want to frame it with the ad or not - size will be the deciding factor since they don't charge tons more for a bigger frame.
mike
<< <i>Thanks PoppaJ. I am also wondering if PSA will grade 1965 push pulls? >>
///////////////////////////////
PSA will NOT grade the '65 Push-Pull either.
<< <i>
<< <i>Thanks PoppaJ. I am also wondering if PSA will grade 1965 push pulls? >>
///////////////////////////////
PSA will NOT grade the '65 Push-Pull either. >>
Scroll down a little. From just over 2 years ago
<< <i>I found the thread where I posted a pic of my first Phillies Cigar card here and my love for it shows here: Collectors Universe thread, page 7
Scroll down a little. From just over 2 years ago >>
I remember when you posted those scans - very cool stuff.
mike