Liberty Nickel Registry Set Collectors
erwindoc
Posts: 5,144 ✭✭✭✭✭
I have been a modern collector for a long time and I wanted to start a classic set worthy of the registry. I have been mulling this question over for weeks and finally getting it down to two series. I have always liked Liberty Nickels and I think I am leaning towards a registry set cause there are no color designations to worry with or strike designations to drive the price through the roof.
Would any of you more advanced collectors in the series be willing to share tips and pitfalls to help before I jump in? I have been through both the Q. David Bowers book and the Peters and Mohon book on the series and learned as much as I can.
Would any of you more advanced collectors in the series be willing to share tips and pitfalls to help before I jump in? I have been through both the Q. David Bowers book and the Peters and Mohon book on the series and learned as much as I can.
0
Comments
2) Don't settle for a coin with subpar strike. Look at the stars, Liberty's hair, and the left corn stalk. If they are not full enough for your liking, wait for one that is.
Now for a question for you, what grade are you thinking of going after?
As far as grades go, I think I could finish the set in MS64. I could probably throw a couple of MS65's in the mix if I am patient enough and save up enough money but there is a rather steep price curve going from MS64 to MS65 and sometimes I wonder if its worth it. I am sure that I could find some 64's that look as nice as MS65's. The curve is even steeper going to MS66. I was going to try and get the 1883NC in MS66 since it is cheap compared to the other years in MS66(as cheap as some MS64's).
I am collecting early Lincolns that way. A 64 bn is ok if it is an exceptional strike and has no detracting features. I'm buying Lincolns that I think will be
sought after by collectors in the future. Do you live in East Tennessee? Do you attend the Tennessee State show in Chattanooga? Shag
Location...I live about as far east in the Volunteer state as you can get without being in North Carolina. I have never been to the state show in Chattanooga, but would love to attend at some point in the future. When is it this year?
If you have any questions regarding specific coins or dates, don't hesitate to PM me a question. I'm sure Dave will be just a willing to help if he can be of assistance.
How you been doing, Speety?
Edited to add a few pics.
Dwayne F. Sessom
Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
<< <i>This has been what I am seriously considering because I already have a few that I submitted expecting 64's and came back AU58. LOL
How you been doing, Speety? >>
Ummmm I know that feeling lmao
School is killing me! Kids aren't meant to take 20+ credit hours every fricken quarter
But it's my birthday and I just had some Red Lobster so no complaining...
But to keep my post on topic, erwindoc, I do believe the Liberty nickel series is a great set to work on for some of the reasons you mentioned like lack of mint marks (except 1912) and they are plentiful. One thing I learned is that ANY Liberty nickel that is blast white has been cleaned at some point. If you want truly original coins, these will have an amber tint to them at least, if not other colors, but a light golden tint is common. The blast white coins, although likely dipped at some point, are not devalued because of it unless the luster is damaged.
To illustrate what Speety was talking about as far as strike, see the 1900 below. I sold this coin last year, and really wished I had kept it. This is THE hardest strike I have personally seen on any Liberty nickel. Every detail is present and bold. Pay special attention to Liberty's hair near the tierra, the stars, and the left corn cob on the reverse.
Dwayne F. Sessom
Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
Here is that 1901 raw before I sent it to be graded. I honestly thought it was easily MS64 at the time, but if you look at it closely, you can see the tiniest amount of rub on the knot on the reverse - something that would be SO easy to miss. (I did!) And they may have knocked it down to a 58 because of the little bit of oxidation spots on the reverse, I honestly don't know.
I don't see any wear on the obverse. Also, look at the corn cob on the reverse. It is NOT a full strike. It's slightly weak.
Dwayne F. Sessom
Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
<< <i>Usually, on the obverse, you will first see wear on the hear limmediately above Liberty's ear. On the reverse, the first traces or wear will be on the knot in the bow or on the V itself. >>
The other place to look is the hair above Liberty's forehead.
As for the 1900, I think this date came hammered! By far the finest striking characteristics of any date with the possible exception of the 1892 imho. Our finest struck coin is also the 1900, although our 1885 PCGS, 1895, and 1912-D in MS66 can give it a run for its money... but none of our 4 1892 nickels are weakly struck!
Chris
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo106/coffeyce/P1010051.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo106/coffeyce/P1010050.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo106/coffeyce/P1010052.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo106/coffeyce/P1010053.jpg
I can't really tell too much from the pictures, it looks like it should grade MS something but the coin appears to be pretty badly spotted. I don't think it'd bring too much of a premium if slabbed, I'd probably leave it raw. There are just so many MS 1883 no cent nickels that it'd have to grade MS-65 or so to recover slabbing costs when selling over just selling raw.
Mark