What's more important- Corners or Centering
48leafpsa
Posts: 116
I'm looking to buy a psa graded 51 bowman mantle rookie. there are two that i'm looking at. one is a psa 4 with dead centering and the other is a psa 6, has nice corners and edges, but it's off centered, about 70/30 from left to right. i'm kinda leaning toward the psa 4 because the centering adds eye appeal. i would like to get some opinions. the price difference between the two doesn't matter.
0
Comments
2004 spx
1989 topps psa 10
1959 phillies
Phillies of the 70's
<< <i>i prefer a nicely centered card, a littlke corner wear give it a little more of a authentic look, but with a off center card , sometimes it distracts from the true beauty of it. >>
Agree 100%, there is nothing more annoying to me when a card is OC or Tilt..
#2 color and registration
#3 corners
In my opinion PSA puts too much emphasis on corners in determining the grade of a card.
<< <i>#1 centering
#2 color and registration
#3 corners
In my opinion PSA puts too much emphasis on corners in determining the grade of a card. >>
Agreed.
<< <i>#1 centering
#2 color and registration
#3 corners
In my opinion PSA puts too much emphasis on corners in determining the grade of a card. >>
I totally agree!
brian
Save on ebay with Big Crumbs
<< <i>#1 centering
#2 color and registration
#3 corners
In my opinion PSA puts too much emphasis on corners in determining the grade of a card. >>
///////////////////////////////
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
<< <i>I'll disagree, to a certain degree. I don't mind a bit of off centering at the expense of sharp corners. I remember opening lots of packs as a kid with the centering off, but sharp corners to me indicate a fresher card. >>
I agree with everybody
Seriously, I thik that centering comes first as long as the corners aren't horrible. A card whose corners look sharp to the naked eye should grade better when the centering is exceptionally nice.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
Personally, I'll take a card that's a little off-center versus a card with worn corners. However, there are times that I'd rather have dead nuts corners and will settle for less than appealing centering if the card is a tough issue to find in NM-MT or better corner condition. Such is the case with my 1948 Leaf Chuck Bednariks, which are notoriously OC. I have one PSA 5 (Yellow Background) that has PSA 9+ quality corners with only a sliver of right border and another in a PSA 8 (OC) that has a little more border but softer corners. I love the PSA 5 just because it may be the sharpest 1948 Leaf card I've ever seen and that includes the PSA 9's and SGC 96's I've viewed as well as the PSA 8 that I own.
#2 color and registration
#3 corners
As a collector I prefer nicely centered mid grade cards. It may be different for those who buy to flip.
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
aconte
Matt
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
It depends on the situation. If you are looking for a PSA 6 Mantle and you have a choice between a well centered PSA 6 vs. one that is off centered PSA 6 the obvious answer is the centered one. The value of a PSA 6 will always appreciate more than a PSA 4 from the same year. There are some issues of cards that centering is not as a big deal by the collector like 1954 Wilson Weiners.
There is nothing wrong with buying a very well centered PSA 4.
Good luck
<< <i>In my opinion PSA puts too much emphasis on corners in determining the grade of a card. >>
I feel the same way, it seems that cornering is always considered paramount regardless of centering when they consider grading...why I'm not sure...in fact I do not believe that centering is considered at all, even though they claim it is...
Centering is paramount to me...without it I personally feel it dimishes the look of the card...that being said anyone collecting should collect what they like not the grade, not the centering, not corners...but what looks good to them personally...
Collector
Topps 58,59,60,61,62,63,64 Sets
Fleer 60, 61-62 Sets
Steve
Logan
Kingnascar's PSA Sets
Kingnascar's PSADNA Sets
Centering is a printing flaw.
Worn corners are a mishandling issue.
Pack fresh better.
2. Corners
3. Centering
4. Print Defects.
First two can be affected by mishandling the bottom two cannot. To me I would rather pay more money for a card that just came out of a pack and is OC (to a point) than a worn card. I know when JP had his unopened 1959 Topps baseball card find, he was selling his OC stuff to collectors for huge premiums due to the "freshness" of the cards so there are alot of collectors that like pack fresh appearances over centering.
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle