2009: the end of the decade?

Are we at the end of the decade of the 2000's I see many shows depicting the "blank" of the decade. Is it? We went through this is 2000 and here we are again. The end of the decade should be 12-31-10 and not 12-31-09. I can see arguements for each side. What is yours?
R95
R95
0
Comments
GrandAm
<< <i>There is nothing to argue about. The end of the decade is 12-31-2010
GrandAm
That's the end of 11 years
<< <i>01-01-00 from 01-01-10 is ten years 12-31-09 marks the end of the decade. >>
0 - 9 = 10
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
Not to mention, the first post in a new thread on the forum is '0'
Ed. S.
(EJS)
If you are speaking of the first decade of this millenium then it ends 12-31-2010. If you are speaking of a decade since Y2K then it ends 12-31-2009.
<< <i>There was no "Year Zero" in the Catholic Ecclesiastical reckoning of years (or Roman, either), thus the decade begins with "1" and ends with "10." (Or "I" and "X") >>
This coincides with counting to ten. No one starts the count at 0.
<< <i>There was no "Year Zero" in the Catholic Ecclesiastical reckoning of years (or Roman, either), thus the decade begins with "1" and ends with "10." (Or "I" and "X") >>
Interesting point. If you're going to start each decade with 1981 1991 2001 then I'll agree 2010 but I was born in 1986 so if I start mine there... in 1996 I turned 10 and in 2006 I turned 20. Using your argument then I was never younger than one.
<< <i>There was no "Year Zero" in the Catholic Ecclesiastical reckoning of years (or Roman, either), thus the decade begins with "1" and ends with "10." (Or "I" and "X") >>
However, decades are not markers like centuries and millenia. Decades mark the "human" reckoning of a 10 year period and those are easiest when they go from 0 to 9 rather than 1 to 10. Therefore you have the teens, twenties, thirties, etc. If we use your logic, then 1940 belongs in the thirties.
In the course of things, numbering the days is a local, arbitrary custom: the cycles occur whether they are counted or not.
--jerry
<< <i>So those of you that say "not yet", are you saying that if you start a calendar today the date will be 1/1/01 so that when you get to 1/1/2 you have completed only one year? When a baby is born we don't start them at 1 but at 0. Why not a calendar?
--jerry >>
This gets so convoluted. When your child is 0 years old, he/she is in his/her first year. But I still agree with the decades end on 9s.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
This forum starts the post count at 0.
<< <i>Y2K was 10 years ago.....I say 12/31/09 is the end of the decade, Comrade. >>
Amen!
<< <i>
<< <i>There was no "Year Zero" in the Catholic Ecclesiastical reckoning of years (or Roman, either), thus the decade begins with "1" and ends with "10." (Or "I" and "X") >>
This coincides with counting to ten. No one starts the count at 0. >>
Decades end at the end of a year that ends in zero.
Centuries end at the end of a year that ends in double zero.
Millennia end at the end of a year that ends in triple zero.
However, people will believe whatever they feel like believing. Our local free "Journalism For Dummies" newspaper, the Redeye, has been running ads for "New Years Eve 2010" parties. New Years Eve 2010 is slightly over a year from today. This Thursday night is New Years Eve, 2009, to be followed by New Years Day, 2010.
TD
My Adolph A. Weinman signature

The idea of decades ending in 9 and starting in 0 correllates with the scientific defintion of our calendar. In astronomy, the year Jesus Christ was supposedly born is considered to be year 0. In the religious based calendars, Jesus was born in AD1, and the previous year was BC1. There is no "0" in the religion based calendar system. As a man of science through and through, I go by the counting from a starting point, which is 0. Therefore, for my arguments and debates, I will always say that the 2010's begins on Friday.
Another thing to keep in mind is that while our calendar years are all numeric, they are not "counting" anything. So if I count the number of years I have been on this planet, I would start with my first year on the planet which was 1980. Counting each year I've been around, I've been on this planet for 30 different years, yet I am only 29 years old since the first time I was considered 1 year old was in 1981.
Have you checked inside all the black holes?
My Adolph A. Weinman signature

This Thursday night is New Year's Eve, December 31,2009 or the Eve of New Year's day January 1, 2010. I think I will accept New Years Eve 2010 as being acceptable.
Now, which comes first - Christmas or New Year's?
<< <i>History repeats itsself. The years/decades/centuries are only a measurement for those who need a ruler to make it all make sense, can ya dig it
It doesn't repeat, it rhymes.
The Gay 90s 1890-99
The Roaring 20s 1920-29
the 60s 1960-69
the 80s 1980-89
Whatever you call the first decade of a century ("the ohs", maybe?) it would be 2000-09
The teens start 1-1-2010.
I was expecting the naughties (from naught), but it never caught on.
The government issues 10th anniversary coins on their 11th year, and 20th anniversary coins on their 21st year.
I tend to believe me, and I tend to think that the government is screwed up.
Atoms cease to exist inside of a black hole.
Please elaborate. (Extra points given if you can explain how we know this.)
I knew it would happen.
<< <i><<Whatever you call the first decade of a century ("the ohs", maybe?) it would be 2000-09>>
I was expecting the naughties (from naught), but it never caught on. >>
//
I think I have the perfect name for the 2000's..The Bubble Decade! And since we have one more year left in the decade it should go out with a bang with the burst of the treasury bubble.
ed4tb
A single year has not been completed until all 12 months have passed therefor year 1 has been completed at the end of the 12th month - "one". At the end of the 2nd year you have completed two years.
Count on your fingers with me: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, TEN. At the completion of that 10th year you have completed one decade. The new decade starts on 11 or in our time 2011.
I can't believe it is even an argument.
Time, space, matter, and energy (that we know as the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism) all collapse into the singularity that defines a black hole. Within a black hole, there is just... black hole stuff. kinda boring.
the interesting action occurs at the event horizon
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry