Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

1967 Canada Dollar Photos added TRIPLE STRUCK?

Does anyone here know how many of these were struck and are any of come triple struck on the obverse and reverse?


Thanks






image

image



Does anyone here know how many of these were struck and are any of come triple struck on the obverse and reverse?


Thanks

Comments

  • farthingfarthing Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭
    The mintage was 6,767,496 according to Krause, Charlton lists the mintage as 5,816,176 with a note that 141,741 were melted.

    The mint employees had a lot of fun late night with these Centennial Dollars. There are a number of "varieties" made, the best known is probably the "diving goose" variety. I have seen images of double and triple struck goose dollars before, yours is a nice one!

    I've never read of an estimate on the number of 1967 dollars that were played with.
    R.I.P. Wayne, Brad
    Collecting:
    Conder tokens
    19th & 20th Century coins from Great Britain and the Realm
  • Heritage NYINC has the lone PCGS 66 in it.
    Lurker since '02. Got the seven year itch!

    Gary
  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,235 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hi Gary I saw that, but it is only double struck, this coin, my coin has three, so I was wondering if anyone knew about it. I also when through the archives and did not fins a triple strike at auction at least Heritage. The surfaces are very proof like and the marks are on the Anacs holder which reads "double struck"

    I am looking for any info on the triple struck ones...
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,996 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's my coin that's tied for #2 at PCGS:

    image
    image
    When in doubt, don't.
  • coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    I must be blind. I can see the double strike, but not the the third. ???
  • tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    Cool!
    But I have some vision problems as well. I only see 2
  • There are 3 'II's on the obverse and 3 dates on the reverse. Looks like a triple to me...
    Very cool! image
    Jim
  • coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭


    << <i>There are 3 'II's on the obverse and 3 dates on the reverse. Looks like a triple to me...
    Very cool! image
    Jim >>



    There we go. The 3 IIs make it. I dismissed the multiple dates because the design has a date range 1867-1967, so differentiating the start and end dates in the multiples got too confusing.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,338 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Two strikes. You are seeing ELIZABETH II H II as the "three II's."
    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Looks like there's doubling all over one of the strikes. I still think there's 3 strikes. Send it in!
    Jim
  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,235 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD is right about the "H", I can see the cross beam in the second "II", but there is something else going on here different than the others I have seen which is not that many. The Heritage Archives have only 5 or so and one current. My coin look like a much more dramatic rotation on the the second strike than any I have seen.


    Who do I send it to PCGS?

    How do folks know the populations on these if they are Mint errors and thus no Pop reports exist?


  • << <i>TD is right about the "H", I can see the cross beam in the second "II", but there is something else going on here different than the others I have seen which is not that many. The Heritage Archives have only 5 or so and one current. My coin look like a much more dramatic rotation on the the second strike than any I have seen.


    Who do I send it to PCGS?

    How do folks know the populations on these if they are Mint errors and thus no Pop reports exist? >>



    I think you are correct, there's a lot going on with that coin and probably better to see it in hand before a proper call can be made. What I'm seeing is doubling on one of the strikes plus of course a second rotated strike. I might be wrong but it looks much more dramatic than the one Dennis posted.
    PCGS of course, or NGC for the submission.
    Good Luck and Merry Christmas!
    Jim
Sign In or Register to comment.