Do you own a graded and raw set of the same year?

I was looking thru one of my sets and thinking, while its nice to have a fully graded set, I might want a raw set so I can flip thru them and enjoy the cards.
Its tough to enjoy 752 plastic covered cards, it makes me miss the raw ones, I relaize a set in binders is still protected but at least you can flip thru it and enjoy them vs getting a hand full of plastic covered cards and looking at them.
Does anyone else feel this way? If so, have you ever had a raw and graded set? I was thinking of getting a lesser quality set to enjoy along with the graded one I have in one of the sets I have.
Anyone else think that way? If so, which sets have you gotten in raw form while having one graded?
Its tough to enjoy 752 plastic covered cards, it makes me miss the raw ones, I relaize a set in binders is still protected but at least you can flip thru it and enjoy them vs getting a hand full of plastic covered cards and looking at them.
Does anyone else feel this way? If so, have you ever had a raw and graded set? I was thinking of getting a lesser quality set to enjoy along with the graded one I have in one of the sets I have.
Anyone else think that way? If so, which sets have you gotten in raw form while having one graded?
The Link below will take you to the PSA Boards 1952 Set Build, I also have made 5 slideshows each slideshow is 100 cards long, card numbers 1-99,100-199,200-299,300-399, and 400-407
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
0
Comments
I worry about cards getting dinged in pages much more than corner bends/wear in rigid holders, although recent posts on the subject have scared me a bit.
Kiss me twice.....let's party.
Hopefully my son will have some interest too. I found raw sets in binders have a tendancy to sit on a shelf; where nice organized slabs (for me anyway) allows me to enjoy with minimal handling worry. Thou; I'm an antique book guy too so parchment handling and great care in handling in general I probably take a bit too far anyway.
-jake
PSA could make so much more money with their business if they offered a flat grading rate for complete sets.
It would cost 3000 or more (without shipping) to get a standard set (topps) graded.
I have a few sets that I have been building but really can't afford (nor would I want to) pay thousands for grading a set that is worth far less than the grading fees.
When grading a complete set (especially topps) it would seem to cut grading costs as it is one product and one employee or group of employees can probably focus their time at a much quicker rate.
I WOULDN'T CARE HOW LONG IT TOOK.
Maybe a end of year special for 1200 bucks (with a 1year turn around time) to grade a topps set from 1952 forward.
I don't know, maybe I am expecting too much, but it seems to me that PSA doesn't want a large influx of cards to grade and could lower their prices (especially in large submissions/like set grading).
The economy has driven their specials lower and lower, and most people won't grade a large lot unless there is a key bulk special.
anyone with thoughts on this ?
Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
- 1962 Topps Master set
- 1963 Topps
- 1965 Topps
I started collecting raw and then drifted over to the dark (and expensive) side.
Also, once I completed my 1956 Topps baseball set in raw, I had to go for the master set - with all the white and gray back variations. Because, that set is too easy with just one Mantle, Mays, Williams, Clemente, J Robby, Aaron, etc.
Jack
Im darn close to being done with most of the 80's football sets, and I own quite a few raw sets of each too. I find a card worth grading, if it comes back a 10, I crack out my 9.
Your right, there is nothing that equals the nostalgia of actually holding your cards in your hands without that "plastic tomb" in the way
back in january 2003 i started collecting that set in psa 7 and 8; almost seven years later, i still need seven cards to complete that set. (at the rate i'm going i'm lucky to get two cards a year).
on a related note, anyone got a hemus, throneberry, turley all-star, dodgers, cubs, white sox or senators team in psa 7 or 8 that they want to sell???????
The raw sets are definitely easier to store and handle!
patrick
Here's one for you...
I didnt know this until I read the back of the card the other day...
Bobby Avila Card #257 1952 Topps- Was the First Mexican Born Player to make the Grade and play in the Majors. He was a graduate of The hotbed of baseball " The University of Mexico"
Link To Scanned 1952 Topps Cards Set is now 90% Complete Plus Slideshows of the 52 Set
Its funny I was just talking about this the other week with some friends of mine. I have decided to collect sets raw and buy or get graded the rookie cards and some star cards from each set I want. I think it will take a lot less time and my pocket book will thank me also.
i just like these 2 sets. baseball i need to finish a graded set first.
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
Mike
------
stupid print dots
I have the graded currently with Memory Lane Auction (below) and a few ungraded sets of this as well.
I have a graded set and a nice NM++ set that was made up from some vending boxes that I busted looking for PSA 9 cards., but because of centering or a corner ding wouldn't be gradable. Also have a NM- set from '77.
'69 Topps Basketball
I have a graded one and a VG-NM raw one that is missing the big three of Kareem, Havalcheck and the C/L