Home U.S. Coin Forum

Crusty twins: Two 1821 Bust Dimes

It was almost 8 years ago when I purchased my first Bust Dimes. It cost me a whole $18, and that was a lot of money for my 13-year old self to spend on a coin. But I bought it anyway because it was then the oldest US Coin I had in my collection. The coin in question was the 1821 Large Date Bust Dime shown below. It grades about Fine details, with a dentil impression on the reverse and a very light ding on the rim. Regardless, it has been a worthy addition to my relatively recent goal of assembling a complete Capped Bust Dime date-set with major varieties.

About two weeks ago I found its Small Date twin. There was no way I could pass up the opportunity to not purchase it. Rarely does an identical twin, albeit a new addition to my collection, come up for sale. It matched the color, the wear, and the overall look I am going for in my set. Needless to say, I paid a bit more than my first 1821 Dime, but still a reasonable and fair price. I am very pleased to add this 1821 Small Date to my major variety collection, and wanted to share each with you.

As you can see in my sig line, I only have 12 more pieces before my set is finished. I'm not in any hurry to complete this set, and will patiently wait for the perfect specimen (like my NewP 1821 Small Date). Hope you enjoy image


imageimage

imageimage

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275


    << <i>Congrads ont he colelction getting ever closer to completion. Although they have a similar look that 1821 small date is killer compared to your first coin the large date. I agree your first coin should be memorable but I have to tell you that the small date kills the large date imho. >>


    Agreed, and I love looking at the small date. The Large Date will probably never be sold, or not for a while, but a similar replacement to the small date will be made at some point
  • breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,257 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like both of them -- each has quite a few stories that will never be told. When did the gash on the Large Date's reverse occur? 1821? 1921? And how did it happen? I agree that the Small Date is in better shape but I am glad you shared them both. Good luck completing the set.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    I have no idea when the dentil mark occured on the reverse of the Large Date. Most likely late in its history, possibly 1860's or 1870's, but no one will ever know when it happened or exactly how.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file