Toggle navigation
Quick Links:
Collectors Corner
|
PCGS
|
PSA
|
PSE
|
Collectors.com
|
CU
|
Coinflation
Categories
Discussions
Activity
Best Of...
Sign In
Home
›
U.S. Coin Forum
What will this 1961 Type B Washington grade??
ksteelheader
Posts:
11,777
✭
November 27, 2009 3:10AM
in
U.S. Coin Forum
What say ye??
0
Comments
docg
Posts:
528
✭✭
November 27, 2009 3:45AM
Based on the photo I would say MS64-65
0
19Lyds
Posts:
26,492
✭✭✭✭
November 27, 2009 3:46AM
whats that on the surface Kenny?
First reaction: Possibly MS64 depending upon the surface.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
The name is LEE!
0
emzee
Posts:
1,862
✭✭✭
November 27, 2009 3:55AM
PR 65-66
0
LindeDad
Posts:
18,766
✭✭✭✭✭
November 27, 2009 4:01AM
<< <i>PR 65-66 >>
May be a proof that surface is funcky.
My Current project....
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/160794
0
ksteelheader
Posts:
11,777
✭
November 27, 2009 4:24AM
<< <i>whats that on the surface Kenny?
First reaction: Possibly MS64 depending upon the surface. >>
A quick dip and acetone rinse won't remove whatever it is. The coin is starting to look like a proof, although there seems to be no wire rim.
0
19Lyds
Posts:
26,492
✭✭✭✭
November 27, 2009 5:18AM
The coin does not look like a proof to me.
given the fact that a quick dip and acetone rinse does not affect the surface, I'm gonna change my grade to "Genuine".
Did you use E-Z-Est for your dip?
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
The name is LEE!
0
ksteelheader
Posts:
11,777
✭
November 27, 2009 5:50AM
<< <i>The coin does not look like a proof to me.
given the fact that a quick dip and acetone rinse does not affect the surface, I'm gonna change my grade to "Genuine".
Did you use E-Z-Est for your dip? >>
Yes, E-Z-Est
0
morgandollar1878
Posts:
4,006
✭✭✭✭✭
November 27, 2009 6:35AM
If it still looks like that after a dip, then I agree with genuine only.
Instagram: nomad_numismatics
0
coinnut86
Posts:
1,592
✭✭✭
November 27, 2009 6:38AM
It looks like a low quality scan.... Does the surface look any better in hand?
0
NotSure
Posts:
2,978
✭✭✭
November 27, 2009 6:49AM
If after a dip/rinse, it hasn't come off, I'm with the 'gennie' crowd.
I'll come up with something.
0
mach19
Posts:
4,002
✭✭
November 27, 2009 6:55AM
I don't know Ken, Honest opinion.........
TIN SOLDIERS & NIXON COMING
0
MORGANHUNTER2
Posts:
4,473
✭
November 27, 2009 7:14AM
It looks like PVC on the Reverse and environmental damage to the obverse- odds are it would bag on ya, but if it were given a grade I would venture a guess of 64.
0
Leave a Comment
Bold
Italic
Strikethrough
Ordered list
Unordered list
Format
Spoiler
Code
Quote
Heading 2
Heading 1
Emoji
Url
Image
Align left
Align center
Align right
Toggle HTML view
Toggle full page
Toggle lights
Drop image/file
Home
•
U.S. Coin Forum
Comment As ...
Comments
First reaction: Possibly MS64 depending upon the surface.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>PR 65-66 >>
May be a proof that surface is funcky.
<< <i>whats that on the surface Kenny?
First reaction: Possibly MS64 depending upon the surface. >>
A quick dip and acetone rinse won't remove whatever it is. The coin is starting to look like a proof, although there seems to be no wire rim.
given the fact that a quick dip and acetone rinse does not affect the surface, I'm gonna change my grade to "Genuine".
Did you use E-Z-Est for your dip?
The name is LEE!
<< <i>The coin does not look like a proof to me.
given the fact that a quick dip and acetone rinse does not affect the surface, I'm gonna change my grade to "Genuine".
Did you use E-Z-Est for your dip? >>
Yes, E-Z-Est