Options
1813 Large Cent for the Album
Barndog
Posts: 20,468 ✭✭✭✭✭
this is the S-293. Just got it today and added it to my album.
Opinions on grade, surfaces, or anything else related to the
coin are welcome. The opinions of others will not change my
opinion of the coin
Opinions on grade, surfaces, or anything else related to the
coin are welcome. The opinions of others will not change my
opinion of the coin
0
Comments
<< <i>The opinions of others will not change my >>
Granted!
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
An overall attractive example with plenty of details left, and perfect for an album.
Congrats on your NEWP...Mike
Here is another opinion on the coin:
merse
<< <i>thanks for the comments, folks.
Here is another opinion on the coin:
>>
The background in this picture is just ruining that pcgs label!
So many have corrosion, this one seems to have been relatively well cared for.
Edit: PCGS F12 for comparison. Sorry for the smallish pix- they are all I have left of it. It lasted about 4 minutes on BST a while back. I think it was Braddick who swooped in and grabbed it. The second person in line offered me even more money for than I'd asked, but a deal's a deal, and to Braddick (or whoever) it went. I left a little money on the table that time. This one was a straight F12 to F12 crossover from an ANACS crackout, as I recall. Obviously the different grades on yours and mine must have something to do with strike, because at a glance, mine appears sharper, despite being three points lower. Of course it's an 1812 and not an 1813. Different year, die state, and variety.
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
I really love the Early Coppers, especially circulated ones.
......I collect old stuff......
<< <i>Looks as the planchet was thick on one side and thin on the other, which would account for the boldness and the weakness of this beautiful original piece. >>
So would a misaligned die, which is, I believe, the cause of the feature you describe.
<< <i>Strange strike. I agree that it was lacquered, probably. Sure, it's got some marks and scuffs, but I like it. No major corrosion or porosity or pitting, which you've gotta respect on a Classic Head cent. Are you an EAC guy?
>>
I joined EAC in August. Great organization!
the strike is nice and the grade should have been somewhat higher than
F-15. Just a guess it's somewhere around die state III.
Can you see any evidence of a 3/2 overdate?
R.I.P. Bear
<< <i>It's an axially misaligned die, with a poor quality planchet. Seems to me
the strike is nice and the grade should have been somewhat higher than
F-15. Just a guess it's somewhere around die state III.
Can you see any evidence of a 3/2 overdate? >>
I don't know specifically what to look for insofar as a 3/2 is concerned, but nothing "jumps out" at me
It looks like a re-punched "3" to me due to the the top left tip of the "3". All the 1812 "2's" are quite rounded.