Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

ERROR CARD OF THE WEEK 11/22/2009 (1978 & 1979 Topps Bump Wills)

The 1979 Topps baseball card set featured an error card of Bump Wills, decent photography, and little else to distinguish it. The first printing accidentally showed Bump Wills as a member of the Blue Jays and it was quickly corrected (see below). The error version sold for the then-lofty sum of $8 at first but cooled until the Pedro Guerrero rookie card caught it in the price guide a half-decade later at $4.


This is a card that brought a lot of attention to error/variation collectors and the recognition for future errors by card companies.


check it out:

image

Please post some comments !!!!

Another thread every week.
Buying:
Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”

Comments

  • Options
    VitoCo1972VitoCo1972 Posts: 6,127 ✭✭✭
    Might I suggest combining your Error card threads into one thread that is updated regularly, much like the raw card Saturday thread or the Mail Call thread? That way people can go back an look at updates without having to search for old threads. You would just Edit the thread title when you add a new one and people will get it. I would think you would get more readers and comments that way.
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭
    I kind of like them separate so that I can use them for my future blogs and listings. I also think when a thread gets many pages people lose interest and people hate clicking around pages trying to find the "exact page" they needed.

    Hopefully, a new thread every week isn't a problem.
    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options
    firedawg45firedawg45 Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭
    which one is worth more?
    # 2 Pete Rose Master Set , also
    collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭
    The "BlueJays" version is the error and harder to find. Although both variations don't sell for much at this time (less than 5 bux).

    The "BlueJays" error is what is considered to be more valuable, usually getting a couple bux more.
    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options
    one of the more famous "recent" errors. hard to believe 30 years old!
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭
    yeah, time is flying. I actually don't have a "BLUEJAYS" version in PSA 9 or 10, so if anyone actually has this PM me to work something out.
    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options
    SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I remember that card well.

    As the first variation card since the 1974 Topps Washington NL/San Diego Padres cards, it pretty much started the variation mania that hit full-force in 1981 with Fleer and Donruss.


    Steve
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭
    Yeah, it seems when "Error Mania" hit, thats when cards are considered "Modern" ....thats probably no coincidence.
    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options
    CWUCAT62CWUCAT62 Posts: 91 ✭✭✭
    Very nice again Rich. Can't wait until next week.
    Andre Dawson Super Collector, who also collects the following-
    *Baseball* HOF autographs, Harold Baines, Pete Rose, Joe Morgan & Seattle Mariners
    *Football* Seattle Seahawks, Kenny Easley, Steve Largent, Jon Kitna, & Brian Bosworth
    YouTube Channel link; https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAyO141lGqcV2fEjt723jUQ
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭
    thank you .... I will try to never miss a week
    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options


    << <i>I remember that card well.

    As the first variation card since the 1974 Topps Washington NL/San Diego Padres cards, it pretty much started the variation mania that hit full-force in 1981 with Fleer and Donruss.


    Steve >>



    Really is that the only error card from 1975-1979 ?? Rich can you provide the error cards from 1989 topps ? pm Thanks
    1938 Cartledge Boxing cards psa 7 - psa 10
    1951 Topps Red backs psa 8 only!
    1960 Golden Press Presidential set Psa 8 's - Psa 9's
    1961 Golden Press psa 9's
    1976 Topps baseball psa 9 Stars
    1980 Kelloggs baseball Psa 9's - Psa 10's
    1988-1989 Fleer Basketball psa 9's
    1988-1989 Fleer Stickers psa 9's
    1989-1990 Fleer Basketball psa 10's
    1992 Coca-Cola Donruss Nolan Ryan 1-26 Psa 10 only Gpa 9.80++ E-mail Newyork00007@aol.com
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭
    PM'd ya with the 89 errors
    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options


    << <i>I kind of like them separate so that I can use them for my future blogs and listings. I also think when a thread gets many pages people lose interest and people hate clicking around pages trying to find the "exact page" they needed.

    Hopefully, a new thread every week isn't a problem. >>



    Thinks it's better with seperate threads for the reasons you mention above. As usual, another fun read this week.
  • Options
    Don't forget this card's ugly older sister:

    1978 Topps Bump Wills #23 with Black Circle on front.

    image

    A much rarer variation that preceded his famous 1979 card.

    The rare version has a black 1" "circle" shape (looks like it was drawn on the negative with a sharpie) printed next to the trophy on front.

    It's also worth noting that there are version that show varying degrees of the black circle through the yellow of the cup but the rest of the black ink removed.
    My Error & Variation Blog

    Collecting Robin Ventura and Matt Luke.
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Don't forget this card's ugly older sister:

    1978 Topps Bump Wills #23 with Black Circle on front.

    image

    A much rarer variation that preceded his famous 1979 card.

    The rare version has a black 1" "circle" shape (looks like it was drawn on the negative with a sharpie) printed next to the trophy on front.

    It's also worth noting that there are version that show varying degrees of the black circle through the yellow of the cup but the rest of the black ink removed. >>



    This is actually one of my favorite error cards. I now own 2 or 3 of them.

    Many error/variation collectors want this to be cataloged but it is ignored because of the black ink's "varying degrees". I think that is a mistake because it is a hard to get error that has great value in the industry.

    If it was cataloged as the "black ink" version, a collector could simply determine if they own a nice, dark inked error or one that is not so much of a circle.

    Maybe AUPT can add some insight here. Thanks for the post JC>

    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options
    bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    I have several uncatalogged errors/variations/print defects in the 75 to 79 Topps sets, and two catalogged items ( SCD 2010) that come to mind are the 78 Morales ( 374) and the 79 Metzger (167--3 versions listed)
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • Options
    richtreerichtree Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I have several uncatalogged errors/variations/print defects in the 75 to 79 Topps sets, and two catalogged items ( SCD 2010) that come to mind are the 78 Morales ( 374) and the 79 Metzger (167--3 versions listed) >>



    yeah, I have the Metzger variations, and will probably use them for a thread in the near future.

    The Morales I still need to get my hands on.
    Buying:
    Topps White Out (silver) letters Alex Gordon
    80 Topps Greg Pryor “No Name"
    90 ProSet Dexter Manley error
    90 Topps Jeff King Yellow back
    1958 Topps Pancho Herrera (no“a”)
    81 Topps Art Howe (black smear above hat)
    91 D A. Hawkins BC-12 “Pitcher”
  • Options

    @richtree said:
    << Don't forget this card's ugly older sister:

    1978 Topps Bump Wills #23 with Black Circle on front.

    A much rarer variation that preceded his famous 1979 card.

    The rare version has a black 1" "circle" shape (looks like it was drawn on the negative with a sharpie) printed next to the trophy on front.

    It's also worth noting that there are version that show varying degrees of the black circle through the yellow of the cup but the rest of the black ink removed. >>

    This is actually one of my favorite error cards. I now own 2 or 3 of them.

    Many error/variation collectors want this to be cataloged but it is ignored because of the black ink's "varying degrees". I think that is a mistake because it is a hard to get error that has great value in the industry.

    If it was cataloged as the "black ink" version, a collector could simply determine if they own a nice, dark inked error or one that is not so much of a circle.

    Maybe AUPT can add some insight here. Thanks for the post JC>

    Richtree, Do you know what the going price for this circle card is? Roger03@aol.com

Sign In or Register to comment.