No catch if you're pushed out of bounds
Elemenopeo
Posts: 2,577 ✭✭
in Sports Talk
... is BS. Change it back.
0
Comments
It's about fault; if the receiver clearly makes the catch and clearly would have landed in-bounds, then he shouldn't be penalized because of something out of his control. It's the forward-motion rule, analogized to a pass reception.
PoppaJ
i like the rule. the offense gets its fair share of breaks in the rules. how many times do you see a WR run into a defensive player and ends up with an illegal contact flag.
Collecting:
Brett Favre Master Set
Favre Ticket Stubs
Favre TD Reciever Autos
Football HOF Player/etc. Auto Set
Football HOF Rc's
NFL... It used to be that if you made catch but were pushed out of bounds before getting both feet down, the ref could award you the catch anyway. The rule was changed this season. Receivers got screwed.
<< <i>NFL... It used to be that if you made catch but were pushed out of bounds before getting both feet down, the ref could award you the catch anyway. The rule was changed this season. Receivers got screwed. >>
Thanks. I was unaware of the change, but I am not a big NFL fan.
Agreed. The new rules have made this league a QB/passing league. Remember the days when Trent Dilfer or Doug Williams could win you a Super Bowl? That will not happen again as long as the current rules are enforced the way they are. The NFL has tried to dumb it down to keep it as black-and-white as possible for the refs, and it is ruining the game. That's why ticky-tack roughing the passer calls and illegal contact penalties are the norm.
If they are going to call illegal contact as strict as they have been these last 3-4 years, they should at least remove the automatic first down portion of the penalty, and just make it a 5-yd penalty. Half the time it is against a WR on the opposite side of the field that the ball is thrown to. It's a joke.