Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

modern fb question

thehallmarkthehallmark Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
In case he were to go on to have a monster career, which card goes into the registry as Joe Flacco's "best" rc?

Comments

  • MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
    If the Heisman registry is a good example, then the Topps Chrome would be used. Most of his better ones have autos.
    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
  • MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
    Was thinking about this earlier. I am now thinking the 2008 Stadium Club RC might be the 2008 cards we should use. They are numbered to 1399 (I think) and are considered SPs, but not rare enough to be excluded. They are likely worth more then their Topps Chrome counterpart.
    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭✭✭
    the modern rookie card that people want is the SP Authentic patch auto. the Exquisite is priced too high from the start, SPA is what to go with. I do not really care for patch auto cards, but as far as rookie cards go these are what is collected for modern.
    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
    The SP Authentic are nice. However, Auto RCs can not be used for the registry.
    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
  • thehallmarkthehallmark Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭
    Topps Chrome does seem to be the set that is used for the registry when the regular SPA cards are too shortprinted.

    Who decides this, ultimately?
Sign In or Register to comment.