Options
Poll: Which of the two choices do you believe leads to more coins being dipped??

Just wondering.
Al H.
Al H.
0
Comments
as for me, I love toning, but if it is ugly and distracting and yet the coin is solid underneath, it must receive a bath, as many a Frankie has, some of these have drab fugly toning, and yet a gem of a coin hiding underneath... There is a place for dipping IMO, but for the most part, I don't like it and like the original skin baby...
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
How can I, as a collector, know how many coins dealers have dipped? I've heard stories. But I have few data points.
I'm not a dealer. I'm not part of that network.
Even reading the forums here, I can only count a few threads where a dipped coin shows up on Heritage that used to be a toned coin.
As a dealer, don't you risk your reputation by doing this? Coloring a coin...uncoloring a coin...it's viewed with suspicion.
I do know that I have dipped coins (ASEs, not really coins) that I have either stored poorly, or have purchased from someone else who stored them poorly.
And i've dipped spouse medals fresh from the mint to eliminate the dark spots.
And the there is the time I dipped the three worst raw eBay morgans I had. Previously doctored by someone playing chemist. Terrible results, but no damage done.
So, I think that the vast majority of dipping going on is to correct tarnish due to poor storage.
Although I may be wrong here, I must answer based on my experience.