Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Opinions wanted on this Mercury dime.

ajaanajaan Posts: 17,124 ✭✭✭✭✭
Thanks in advance.


image

DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


Don

Comments

  • Options
    Looks like a winner!

    Next to the '16-D this is the toughest! I like the '42/1 better than the '42-D over 1 because it is more obvious. image
  • Options
    savoyspecialsavoyspecial Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭
    not authentic

    www.brunkauctions.com

  • Options
    BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The obverse makes me think it isn't authentic (I agree with Savoyspecial).
    Since I am not a merc expert, when it looks like that, I wouldn't buy it unless it was PCGS/NGC/ANACS slabbed....even that, I don't know since I don't like the obv look.

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • Options
    commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,078 ✭✭✭
    Definitely not genuine.

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • Options
    adamlaneusadamlaneus Posts: 6,969 ✭✭✭
    Coin surface does look a little odd overall.

    Especially the big dark blob on the obverse.

    I don't know enough about these to know the wear pattern.

    It should be authenticated by a TPG in my opinion.
  • Options
    AethelredAethelred Posts: 9,288 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    It should be authenticated by a TPG in my opinion. >>



    I wouldn't waste my money, there is no question this coin is counterfeit. The shape of the 4 is not correct and the 2/1 is all wrong, the 1 is on top of the 2.
    If you are in the Western North Carolina area, please consider visiting our coin shop:

    WNC Coins, LLC
    1987-C Hendersonville Road
    Asheville, NC 28803


    wnccoins.com
  • Options
    commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,078 ✭✭✭
    It may be a genuine 1942, but it is not an overdate. There is no doubt.

    image

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • Options
    adamlaneusadamlaneus Posts: 6,969 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    It should be authenticated by a TPG in my opinion. >>



    I wouldn't waste my money, there is no question this coin is counterfeit. The shape of the 4 is not correct and the 2/1 is all wrong, the 1 is on top of the 2. >>



    Well, then. Seeing how the members of this forum ripped this one apart...

    If the coin fails the "ripped-apart test" on the forum, then there doesn't seem to be a need to submit for disauthentication.

    And yet, there have been plenty of threads that started out with a "this is fake" and ended up with a "no it isn't" by the experts. Sounds like this thread is not going in that direction.
  • Options
    FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,408 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks "Not Good" to me. Never have cared for the over-dates. They are way over hyped.

    Ken
  • Options
    tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    Not genuine or altered date.
  • Options
    fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    IMO Counterfiet.

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,124 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks. I guess the masses have spoken.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    Here is an image of mine.

    image

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Options
    That is one sorry looking fake!

    JT
    It is health that is real wealth, not pieces of gold and silver. Gandhi.

    I collect all 20th century series except gold including those series that ended there.
  • Options
    I got faked out! I promise I'll look closer next time.
  • Options
    segojasegoja Posts: 6,112 ✭✭✭✭
    Not even close. Please note the weakness of the detail...even though it's circ. Look at FCLOUDS and compare.

    Color is all wrong as well
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • Options
    As stated, the coin is wrong on many levels but I want to provide you with a tool HOW to determine a real overdate:

    http://www.stellacoinnews.com/index.php/mercury-dimes-ch-6-194241/

    Another diagnostic is a small die break/gouge on the reverse to the left of the fasces (forgot where I saved my pic, sorry)

    Hope that helps.

    www.CoinMine.com

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file